you could not follow an analysis deep or otherwise you are only capable of being dupe and repeating your masters smears as you did below
you are worthless subhuman detritus On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your deep analysis of the subject matter - tea baggers > are famous for correctly dividing the word into its constituent parts > and rendering a judgement that is completely divorced from even the > hint of a useful conclusion. You have advanced your lock-step agenda > by one more goose step. > > however, I find your disrespect for the rule of law disturbing. And > always remember and never forget - life is more important than > property. > > On Jun 21, 2:01 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > your gibberish always discredits itself > > > > you are a silly barking chihuahua > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here we have the hypocricy - you guys are blaming Obama for the Coast > > > Guard enforcing Maritime law, saying that there is no need for the > > > barges to obey the law, fuck the law. I bring up the same thing - > > > where Bush used his executive clemency to excuse Libby for obstruction > > > of justice - and you say - it's the law - Bush was within his rights > > > to commute the sentence of a law breaker... not "fuck the law" - you > > > are the ones who are hypocritical - you only want the law obeyed when > > > it is in your best interests. > > > > > On Jun 21, 1:30 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > No, it is exactly ON POINT and that, I fear, is the problem. You rail > > > > against the Bush use of executive privilege and or orders yet will > not > > > > address the coinciding use of same by your party. It is rather > > > hypocritical. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Euwe, you claim....... > > > > > "it's a discussion about the authority of the government through > Bush, > > > > > who undercut the authority of law." > > > > > Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive Abominations > has > > > > > Obama reversed and or removed from practice ??? > > > > > There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan promised to > do > > > > > just that. > > > > > I'll wait for that list... honesty counts... > > > > > ------------- > > > > > Too far afield - Bush and 9/11, Executive clemency, Obama and the > > > > > coast guard authority is already out on a rabbit trail - start a > new > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:55 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Euwe, you claim....... > > > > > > > > "it's a discussion about the > > > > > > authority of the government through Bush, who undercut the > authority > > > > > > of law." > > > > > > > > Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive Abominations > has > > > > > Obama > > > > > > reversed and or removed from practice ??? > > > > > > > > There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan promised > to do > > > > > just > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > I'll wait for that list... honesty counts... > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:43 AM, euwe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > This discussion of Cheney > > > > > > > ------- > > > > > > > This is a discussion about authority and the respect it > deserves. > > > Bush > > > > > > > commuted Libby's sentence, not Cheney - it's a discussion about > the > > > > > > > authority of the government through Bush, who undercut the > > > authority > > > > > > > of law. The idea that was put forth is that the Coast Guard has > no > > > > > > > right to pull a barge out of action when the captain can't be > > > located, > > > > > > > and it does not have the proper mandated life saving and fire > > > fighting > > > > > > > equipment. Life is more important than property. > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:37 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > euwe, > > > > > > > > > > This discussion of Cheney is nothing more than your ongoing > > > effort to > > > > > > > > deflect from or obfuscate the real issue, which is that the > Obama > > > > > > > > administration has, on more than a dozen occasions, slowed or > > > blocked > > > > > > > > efforts to clean up the oil spill. You've proven your > political > > > > > agenda > > > > > > > > is more important than containing the disaster and that you > are > > > > > either > > > > > > > > foolish or naive enough to believe that the handling of the > > > disaster > > > > > > > > by this administration is anything short of gross negligence. > > > > > > > > > > You're no better or worse than those who defended Bush in the > > > face of > > > > > > > > his many failings. Until the general population wakes up and > > > stops > > > > > > > > looking at events thru colored glasses we can forget about > > > getting > > > > > > > > this country back on track. > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:16 am, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > And again he did not pardon Libby > > > > > > > > > =--- > > > > > > > > > he commuted his sentence - that's a form of pardon, but not > a > > > full > > > > > > > > > pardon. It is covered under the same Presidential power of > > > > > executive > > > > > > > > > clemency. He merely didn't clear him of wrong doing - he > "just" > > > > > > > > > removed the inconvenience of serving jail time. Bush had a > > > stake in > > > > > > > > > Libby's obstruction of justice, and probably was forced > into > > > the > > > > > > > > > compromise by Cheney. After that, they weren't so chummy. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 20, 9:42 pm, dick thompson <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > And again he did not pardon Libby so your whole point is > > > moot. > > > > > What > > > > > > > > > > you are saying is that in reality you have no leg to > stand on > > > so > > > > > you > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > just flailing around throwing mud but it won't stick. > > > Typical > > > > > Dem > > > > > > > MO. > > > > > > > > > > > > euwe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > sovereign authority and the respect due. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 20, 7:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Just what does that have to do with the subject at > hand. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> or "I pardoned Libby?" > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?? > These > > > > > ships > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > >>>> not manned by tourists but by seasoned sailors who > are > > > just, > > > > > if > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > >>>> more so, concerned with the preservation of their > own > > > life > > > > > as > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >>>> USCG. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Just which professional is more correct... the > seasoned > > > > > sailor > > > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > > > >>>> seasoned sailor commanded by an organization that > has > > > never > > > > > had > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > >>>> successful "private or public" enterprise ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So have you > got > > > your > > > > > own > > > > > > > carpet > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish parking > lot > > > > > blacktops? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove. > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > > -- > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. > > > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
