On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: *Democrats are not Marxists. * ** *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive Party Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". * ** *======================* ** Which you do, at every opportunity that you get. There is a distinction however, Those who I identify as "Marxists" have a track record of their votes and policies.
Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a Marxist fashion, what else would one call them? ** ** > > > > > On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some secondary >> issue. >> >> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and determine how >> repeal of DADT will effect the military. Second, and more importantly, the >> goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out of amending the proposed >> Defense Appropriations bill now before the Congress. I don't trust the >> likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other Marxists >> controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations. You shouldn't either. >> >> From CNN: >> >> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html >> >> >> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins (Confused, >> Maine) said she would side with the rest of the GOP because the Democratic >> leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of the debate." >> >> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, >> Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said Senate >> Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and Democrats >> "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill. >> >> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the majority >> leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement so that the >> Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said. >> >> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a >> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full debate on >> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal >> before the military has completed its review. >> >> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to be >> completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the implementation >> of any new changes," Snowe's statement said. >> >> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill, would >> not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon completes a >> review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in December >> and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the president, >> defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that the >> military could handle repealing the policy. >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > > > -- > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > Have a great day, > Tommy > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
