*Republicans are Fascist Nazis.* On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *I am out of time and I will waste no more of it on this today. * >> *Democrats are not Marxists, Communists, or Socialists.* >> ** >> *You are mistaken. * >> >> ** >> >> * * >> >> >> >> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Tom, since you seem to have a little time on your hands this >>> afternoon: >>> >>> Here is a post by Travis from yesterday, which is captioned, "Communist >>> Goals - 1963 Congressional Record. In the Congressional Record, an >>> excerpt from, "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen is read and quoted. >>> >>> Why don't you take the time to see how your Senators compare to this >>> track record? How many of the current Democrats have supported the tenets >>> and platform from this excerpt in 1963? I bet it would shock you to learn >>> the truth. >>> >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bbc1dd23fc80d8c1 >>> # >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> *Wrong again.* >>>> *Democrats are not Marxists.* >>>> ** >>>> *Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.* >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> *Democrats are not Marxists. * >>>>> ** >>>>> *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive Party >>>>> Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". * >>>>> ** >>>>> *======================* >>>>> ** >>>>> Which you do, at every opportunity that you get. There is a >>>>> distinction however, Those who I identify as "Marxists" have a track >>>>> record of their votes and policies. >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a Marxist >>>>> fashion, what else would one call them? >>>>> ** >>>>> ** >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some >>>>>>> secondary issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and determine >>>>>>> how repeal of DADT will effect the military. Second, and more >>>>>>> importantly, the goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out >>>>>>> of amending the proposed Defense Appropriations bill now before the >>>>>>> Congress. I don't trust the likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a >>>>>>> host of other Marxists controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations. >>>>>>> You shouldn't either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From CNN: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins >>>>>>> (Confused, Maine) said she would side with the rest of the GOP because >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> debate." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of >>>>>>> Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said >>>>>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and >>>>>>> Democrats "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense >>>>>>> bill. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the >>>>>>> majority leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an >>>>>>> agreement so >>>>>>> that the Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a >>>>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full >>>>>>> debate on >>>>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal >>>>>>> before the military has completed its review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to >>>>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the >>>>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill, >>>>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon >>>>>>> completes >>>>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in >>>>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the >>>>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>>>>> Have a great day, >>>>>> Tommy >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at >>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>>> Have a great day, >>>> Tommy >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at >>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> Have a great day, >> Tommy >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > >
-- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
