If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, then BINGO, you got yourself a duck or in the case of these Dems that Keith mentioned a Marxist. In fact your Dem candidate for senator in Delaware calls himself a Marxist and you had major advisors to your president who claimed they were Marxists and their favorite philosopher was Mao. Just how un-Marxist is that!!

On 09/21/2010 12:22 PM, Tommy News wrote:
*Wrong again.*
*Democrats are not Marxists.*
**
*Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.*

On 9/21/10, *Keith In Tampa* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    *Democrats are not Marxists. *
    **
    *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive
    Party Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". *
    **
    *======================*
    **
    Which you do, at every opportunity that you get.   There is a
    distinction however,   Those who I identify as "Marxists"  have a
    track record of their votes and policies.
    Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a
    Marxist fashion, what else would one call them?
    **
    **



        On 9/21/10, *Keith In Tampa* <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by
            some secondary issue.
            First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and
determine how repeal of DADT will effect the military. Second, and more importantly, the goal by the Marxists is
            to lock the Republicans out of amending the proposed
            Defense  Appropriations bill now before the Congress.  I
            don't trust the likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and
            a host of other Marxists controlling the vote over Defense
            Appropriations.  You shouldn't either.
             From CNN:
            
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html

            But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator
            Susan Collins  (Confused, Maine)  said she would side with
            the rest of the GOP because the Democratic leadership of
            the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of the debate."

            Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint
            Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply
            not fair." But she said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,
            D-Nevada, should give Republicans and Democrats "an equal
            opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill.

            "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on
            the majority leader to work with Republican leaders to
            negotiate an agreement so that the Senate can debate the
            defense bill this week," Collins said.

            In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would
            support a Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should
            be allowed a full debate on the measure. Snowe also
            questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal before the
            military has completed its review.

            "We should all have the opportunity to review that report
            which is to be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate
            this policy and the implementation of any new changes,"
            Snowe's statement said.

            The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense
            policy bill, would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell"
            until after the Pentagon completes a review of the
            repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in
            December and would serve as the basis for necessary
            certification by the president, defense secretary and
            chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that the military
            could handle repealing the policy.


-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
            For options & help see
            http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

            * Visit our other community at
            http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
            <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
            * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
            * Read the latest breaking news, and more.




-- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
        Have a great day,
        Tommy --
        Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
        For options & help see
        http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

        * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
        <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
        * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
        * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.




--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to