OOPs!

 *All thirty nine Republicans voted no. Every single one. One Hunfdred per
cent no. *
**
*Only FOUR out of fifty nine democrats voted no. A very small percentage. *
****
*Your twisted pretzel logic is illogical, and your math is fuzzy.*




On 9/21/10, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Then who was the other vote.   You have accounted for 42 votes and
> there were 43.   BTW the twisted pretzel logic I mentioned earlier with
> regard to Susan Collins is precisely what she gave as her reason for voting
> against the bill.  Talk to Harry Reid.  It was his doing that lost her
> vote.   Nothing twisted pretzel.   The Republicans asked very nicely  to
> open the bill up for amendments and were turned down.  They also asked very
> nicely to hold off until the Pentagon finished their analysis which is due
> on Dec 1 and were turned down.   Two very good reasons to vote against the
> bill.   You are only interested in the DADT part of the bill.   Do you have
> any idea of what else is in that bill?   If it were passed then what would
> be the total consequences of passing it.  DADT would be gone but what else
> would be involved.   After all the Dems are past masters of shoving all
> kinds of things into bills that they expect will pass with no problem such
> as military expenditure bills.   Or the 1099 rules that are included in the
> Obamacare bill.   What do 1099 rules have to do with HCR.   Same with this
> one.  Tell us from all your knowledge just what all is included in this bill
> and what the ramifications of passing them would be.
>
>
> On 09/21/2010 05:04 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>
>  *All thirty nine Republicans voted no. Every single one. One Hunfdred per
> cent no. *
> **
> *Only three out of fifty nine democrats voted no. A very small percentage.
> *
> ****
> *Your twisted pretzel logic is illogical, and your math is fuzzy.*
>
>
> On 9/21/10, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Tommy still tries to blame the Republicans but the Republicans do not have
>> enough members to stop the bill.   It requires Dems to vote NO in order to
>> stop the bill.   If the Dems were to do their usual vote in lock-step then
>> it would have passed.  It did not so therefore the Dems doomed the bill.
>>
>>
>> On 09/21/2010 04:35 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>>
>>> I do have to agree with Tommy on this one though..... "Shame on
>>> the.... 'Democratically controlled'.... Senate".
>>>
>>> On Sep 21, 1:59 pm, Keith In Tampa<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Note how Tom has picked up on the daily far left spin today:
>>>>
>>>> *"This likely means  the policy will stay in place, and that it could
>>>> take
>>>> many more years to repeal the failed Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, which
>>>> has
>>>> ruined thousands of lives and careers and could now ruin thousands more
>>>> after this disappointing vote. Shame on the Senate"
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, dick thompson<[email protected]
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That is still not enough to doom the bill.  The ones who finished the
>>>>> dooming had to have been Dems.  And at that Harry Reid has to share the
>>>>> blame.    Did you think that the Republicans for the most part were
>>>>> voting
>>>>> no because they felt that the Pentagon needed to finish their study of
>>>>> how
>>>>> to implement the repeal of DADT?   The blame is therefore on Reid for
>>>>> trying
>>>>> to shove this bill through without any idea of how to implement the
>>>>> repeal.   How do you set up the troops so that the gays do not get the
>>>>> krep
>>>>> kicked out of them.  Do you allow mixed sex barracks now?  Do you
>>>>> separate
>>>>> gays and non-gays?  How do you punish those who break the new rules.
>>>>>  What
>>>>> would the punishment be and where would it occur.   Do you just think
>>>>> Tinker
>>>>> Bell can pluck her magic twanger and make it all happen with no
>>>>> problems?
>>>>> Will you take responsibility for any problems that occur?  No, all you
>>>>> want
>>>>> to do is blame anyone who does not march in lockstep with Tommy News
>>>>> and his
>>>>> policies and call them names.   Pathetic!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/21/2010 03:28 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> *Every single Republican voted no. They are all to blame.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/21/10, dick thompson<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     Let's see - the Harry Reid policy of not allowing more than one
>>>>>> amendment on the bill chased the one Republican they had, Susan
>>>>>> Collins,
>>>>>> away.  That still left some Dems voting against the bill.  Who were
>>>>>> they.
>>>>>> Why not mention them since they are the ones who doomed the bill.  The
>>>>>> Dems
>>>>>> had the 60 they needed if they got all their members to vote for them.
>>>>>> Don't blame the Republicans for this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/21/2010 03:14 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  *Bad news: Senate Blocks DADT Repeal Amendment in 56-43 cloture vote *
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> *(4 votes short of the 60 votes needed for cloture and repeal)*
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> *This likely means  the policy will stay in place, and that it could
>>>>>> take
>>>>>> many more years to repeal the failed Don't Ask Don't Tell policy,
>>>>>> which has
>>>>>> ruined thousands of lives and careers and could now ruin thousands
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> after this disappointing vote. Shame on the Senate. *
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> *Senator John McCain gave a thumbs up on the Senate floor after the
>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>>>>> Tommy
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community 
>>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community 
>>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>>>> Have a great day,
>>>>> Tommy --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community 
>>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>   --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community 
>>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at 
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> * It's active 
>> and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the
>> latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>  --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>



-- 
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to