Unbelievable!  This goes with the recent one that an illegal who used
someone else's SSN to buy a house, vehicle and to work did not commit a
crime...Ferg


Law restricting where sex offenders can live is unconstitutional, L.A. judge
rules<http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/law-restricting-where-sex-offenders-can-live-unconstitutional-la-judge-rules.html>

November 4, 2010 |  8:07 am

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/law-restricting-where-sex-offenders-can-live-unconstitutional-la-judge-rules.html

Saying sex offenders are being forced to choose between prison and
homelessness, a Los Angeles judge issued an opinion this week blocking
enforcement of provisions a state law restricting how close those offenders
can live from parks or schools.

Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza issued the 10-page ruling after four
registered sex offenders petitioned the court, arguing that the legislation
known as Jessica's Law was unconstitutional.

He said the court had received about 650 habeas corpus petitions raising
similar legal issues, and that hundreds more were being prepared by the
public defender's and alternate public defender's offices.

"The court is not a 'potted plant' and need not sit idly by in the face of
immediate, ongoing and significant violations of parolee constitutional
rights," Espinoza wrote.

Proposition 83, which is better known as Jessica's Law and was
overwhelmingly passed by state voters in 2006, imposes strict residency
requirements on sex offenders, including requirements forbidding them from
residing within 2,000 feet of any public or private school or park where
children regularly gather.

Before the law passed, those residency requirements were imposed only on
offenders whose victims were children.

Civil rights attorneys have argued that provisions of the law make it
impossible for some registered sex offenders to live in densely populated
cities.

Nearly all of San Francisco, for example, is off-limits to sex offenders
because of the number of parks and schools close to housing. Los Angeles
officials also said that there are few places in the city where sex
offenders can find housing that meets Jessica's Law requirements.

The California Supreme Court ruled in February that registered sex offenders
could challenge residency requirements in the law if it proves impossible to
avoid living near parks and schools.

State corrections officials said Wednesday that they could not comment on
the specifics of Espinoza's ruling, but said they would continue to ensure
residency restrictions are imposed in cases where there is a valid reason to
continue enforcing them.

"There are other tools that the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
can and will continue to use to further public safety, including residency
restrictions specific to each offender," said the agency spokesman Luis
Patino.

In his opinion, Espinoza cited comments by Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie
Beck that the Jessica's Law restrictions had resulted in "a marked increase
of homeless/transient registrants." The judge noted that in 2007, there were
30 sex offenders on active parole in the city of Los Angeles. By September
of this year, that number had jumped to 259.

"Rather than protecting public safety, it appears that the sharp rise in
homelessness rates in sex offenders on active parole in Los Angeles County
actually undermines public safety." wrote Espinoza, who is the supervising
judge of the Los Angeles County criminal courts. "The evidence presented
suggests that despite lay belief, a sex offender parolee's residential
proximity to a school or park where children regularly gather does not bear
on the parolee's likelihood to commit a sexual offense against a child."

LAPD officials said they were reviewing the court decision and had no
immediate comment on its specifics.

Last month, in a briefing for the Los Angeles Police Commission, Det. Diane
Webb, who heads a unit responsible for tracking the whereabouts of sex
offenders, said there are about 5,100 registered sex offenders living in the
city.

Of those, about 20%, or approximately 1,020 people, are on parole for felony
crimes and are prohibited by state law from living near a school or park
where children gather, Webb said.

She said that some of the city's sex-offender population has come to Los
Angeles from surrounding cities that have passed additional sex-offender
laws that make it next to impossible for offenders to find a place to live
and push them to look elsewhere, but that Los Angeles does not have any
additional laws on its books, making it a feasible destination.

 -- Andrew Blankstein
 * *

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to