Oh my bleeding heart!!  The recidivism rate CANNOT be ignored even by Florida 
rednecks.  The children mentioned were killed by men who should have been in 
prison serving loooooooooooooonger sentences and now you want to support a 
judge allowing the fox to play in the hen house?  Don't even talk to me Keith.  
A pox on TB forever!!!

CW <g>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Keith In Tampa 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 08:59
Subject: Re: Law restricting where sex offenders can live is unconstitutional, 
L.A. judge rules


Good Mornng CW!!

"Do the names Jessica Lunsford, Polly Klaas, Samantha Runion, Jennifer Thompson 
etc., etc., etc. sound the least bit familiar to you???"

Uhm?   They were all little girls who were murdered by guys who were raised in 
trailer parks up in Ohio?

Okay,  I was attempting to be humorous once again,  and I apologize!

Yes, I know what the recidivism rate is on these kinds of crimes.   That isn't 
the issue.   

There are many other individuals who have been tagged with the "sexual crimes" 
tag, that are not of this same mold.  (Geesh, I can tell stories of folks who 
are no more a sexual deviant or predator than you or I,  but since the Jessica 
Lundsford laws, they are now deemed as such!)  

IF, we are going to punish these folks by giving them terms of imprisonement; 
and IF, these individuals  complete these terms of imprisonment, then there 
must be some place for them to return to.

This was the Judge's point in his ruling.








On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote:




  Do you have any idea, any idea at all, what the recidivism rate is among 
these animals?"

  I really hope I never become so stupid that I am sitting around worrying 
about the rights of these pigs.

  CW
  On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Uhm.....Call me a Moonbat, but I agree with this judge...



     
    On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:














      Unbelievable!  This goes with the recent one that an illegal who used 
someone else's SSN to buy a house, vehicle and to work did not commit a 
crime...Ferg


      Law restricting where sex offenders can live is unconstitutional, L.A. 
judge rules
      November 4, 2010 |  8:07 am

      
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/law-restricting-where-sex-offenders-can-live-unconstitutional-la-judge-rules.html

      Saying sex offenders are being forced to choose between prison and 
homelessness, a Los Angeles judge issued an opinion this week blocking 
enforcement of provisions a state law restricting how close those offenders can 
live from parks or schools.

      Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza issued the 10-page ruling after four 
registered sex offenders petitioned the court, arguing that the legislation 
known as Jessica's Law was unconstitutional.

      He said the court had received about 650 habeas corpus petitions raising 
similar legal issues, and that hundreds more were being prepared by the public 
defender's and alternate public defender's offices.

      "The court is not a 'potted plant' and need not sit idly by in the face 
of immediate, ongoing and significant violations of parolee constitutional 
rights," Espinoza wrote.

      Proposition 83, which is better known as Jessica's Law and was 
overwhelmingly passed by state voters in 2006, imposes strict residency 
requirements on sex offenders, including requirements forbidding them from 
residing within 2,000 feet of any public or private school or park where 
children regularly gather.

      Before the law passed, those residency requirements were imposed only on 
offenders whose victims were children.

      Civil rights attorneys have argued that provisions of the law make it 
impossible for some registered sex offenders to live in densely populated 
cities.

      Nearly all of San Francisco, for example, is off-limits to sex offenders 
because of the number of parks and schools close to housing. Los Angeles 
officials also said that there are few places in the city where sex offenders 
can find housing that meets Jessica's Law requirements.

      The California Supreme Court ruled in February that registered sex 
offenders could challenge residency requirements in the law if it proves 
impossible to avoid living near parks and schools.

      State corrections officials said Wednesday that they could not comment on 
the specifics of Espinoza's ruling, but said they would continue to ensure 
residency restrictions are imposed in cases where there is a valid reason to 
continue enforcing them.

      "There are other tools that the Department of Corrections and 
Rehabilitation can and will continue to use to further public safety, including 
residency restrictions specific to each offender," said the agency spokesman 
Luis Patino.

      In his opinion, Espinoza cited comments by Los Angeles Police Chief 
Charlie Beck that the Jessica's Law restrictions had resulted in "a marked 
increase of homeless/transient registrants." The judge noted that in 2007, 
there were 30 sex offenders on active parole in the city of Los Angeles. By 
September of this year, that number had jumped to 259.

      "Rather than protecting public safety, it appears that the sharp rise in 
homelessness rates in sex offenders on active parole in Los Angeles County 
actually undermines public safety." wrote Espinoza, who is the supervising 
judge of the Los Angeles County criminal courts. "The evidence presented 
suggests that despite lay belief, a sex offender parolee's residential 
proximity to a school or park where children regularly gather does not bear on 
the parolee's likelihood to commit a sexual offense against a child."

      LAPD officials said they were reviewing the court decision and had no 
immediate comment on its specifics.

      Last month, in a briefing for the Los Angeles Police Commission, Det. 
Diane Webb, who heads a unit responsible for tracking the whereabouts of sex 
offenders, said there are about 5,100 registered sex offenders living in the 
city.

      Of those, about 20%, or approximately 1,020 people, are on parole for 
felony crimes and are prohibited by state law from living near a school or park 
where children gather, Webb said.

      She said that some of the city's sex-offender population has come to Los 
Angeles from surrounding cities that have passed additional sex-offender laws 
that make it next to impossible for offenders to find a place to live and push 
them to look elsewhere, but that Los Angeles does not have any additional laws 
on its books, making it a feasible destination.

       -- Andrew Blankstein












      -- 
      Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
      For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
       
      * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
      * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
      * Read the latest breaking news, and more.



    -- 
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.



  -- 
  Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
  For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
   
  * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
  * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
  * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

  -- 
  Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
  For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
   
  * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
  * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
  * Read the latest breaking news, and more.



-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to