I think some restrictions can be used.  Safety of children is important.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>wrote:

> Uhm.....Call me a Moonbat, but I agree with this judge...
>
>
>
>
>   On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Unbelievable!  This goes with the recent one that an illegal who used
>> someone else's SSN to buy a house, vehicle and to work did not commit a
>> crime...Ferg
>>
>>
>> Law restricting where sex offenders can live is unconstitutional, L.A.
>> judge 
>> rules<http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/law-restricting-where-sex-offenders-can-live-unconstitutional-la-judge-rules.html>
>>
>> November 4, 2010 |  8:07 am
>>
>>
>> http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/law-restricting-where-sex-offenders-can-live-unconstitutional-la-judge-rules.html
>>
>> Saying sex offenders are being forced to choose between prison and
>> homelessness, a Los Angeles judge issued an opinion this week blocking
>> enforcement of provisions a state law restricting how close those offenders
>> can live from parks or schools.
>>
>> Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza issued the 10-page ruling after four
>> registered sex offenders petitioned the court, arguing that the legislation
>> known as Jessica's Law was unconstitutional.
>>
>> He said the court had received about 650 habeas corpus petitions raising
>> similar legal issues, and that hundreds more were being prepared by the
>> public defender's and alternate public defender's offices.
>>
>> "The court is not a 'potted plant' and need not sit idly by in the face of
>> immediate, ongoing and significant violations of parolee constitutional
>> rights," Espinoza wrote.
>>
>> Proposition 83, which is better known as Jessica's Law and was
>> overwhelmingly passed by state voters in 2006, imposes strict residency
>> requirements on sex offenders, including requirements forbidding them from
>> residing within 2,000 feet of any public or private school or park where
>> children regularly gather.
>>
>> Before the law passed, those residency requirements were imposed only on
>> offenders whose victims were children.
>>
>> Civil rights attorneys have argued that provisions of the law make it
>> impossible for some registered sex offenders to live in densely populated
>> cities.
>>
>> Nearly all of San Francisco, for example, is off-limits to sex offenders
>> because of the number of parks and schools close to housing. Los Angeles
>> officials also said that there are few places in the city where sex
>> offenders can find housing that meets Jessica's Law requirements.
>>
>> The California Supreme Court ruled in February that registered sex
>> offenders could challenge residency requirements in the law if it proves
>> impossible to avoid living near parks and schools.
>>
>> State corrections officials said Wednesday that they could not comment on
>> the specifics of Espinoza's ruling, but said they would continue to ensure
>> residency restrictions are imposed in cases where there is a valid reason to
>> continue enforcing them.
>>
>> "There are other tools that the Department of Corrections and
>> Rehabilitation can and will continue to use to further public safety,
>> including residency restrictions specific to each offender," said the agency
>> spokesman Luis Patino.
>>
>> In his opinion, Espinoza cited comments by Los Angeles Police Chief
>> Charlie Beck that the Jessica's Law restrictions had resulted in "a marked
>> increase of homeless/transient registrants." The judge noted that in 2007,
>> there were 30 sex offenders on active parole in the city of Los Angeles. By
>> September of this year, that number had jumped to 259.
>>
>> "Rather than protecting public safety, it appears that the sharp rise in
>> homelessness rates in sex offenders on active parole in Los Angeles County
>> actually undermines public safety." wrote Espinoza, who is the supervising
>> judge of the Los Angeles County criminal courts. "The evidence presented
>> suggests that despite lay belief, a sex offender parolee's residential
>> proximity to a school or park where children regularly gather does not bear
>> on the parolee's likelihood to commit a sexual offense against a child."
>>
>> LAPD officials said they were reviewing the court decision and had no
>> immediate comment on its specifics.
>>
>> Last month, in a briefing for the Los Angeles Police Commission, Det.
>> Diane Webb, who heads a unit responsible for tracking the whereabouts of sex
>> offenders, said there are about 5,100 registered sex offenders living in the
>> city.
>>
>> Of those, about 20%, or approximately 1,020 people, are on parole for
>> felony crimes and are prohibited by state law from living near a school or
>> park where children gather, Webb said.
>>
>> She said that some of the city's sex-offender population has come to Los
>> Angeles from surrounding cities that have passed additional sex-offender
>> laws that make it next to impossible for offenders to find a place to live
>> and push them to look elsewhere, but that Los Angeles does not have any
>> additional laws on its books, making it a feasible destination.
>>
>>  -- Andrew Blankstein
>>  * *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at 
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to