The self described simple-minded "Pitbull in Lipstick" deserves to be called "Moose-Woman".
The article is not "crap", and it can be found here as the source link above shows. To repeat: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html On 1/14/11, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > So, let me understand this. "Blood Libel" is a derogatory term but > "Moose-woman" isn't? > > Tommy, where do you find this crap? > > On 1/14/2011 5:36 AM, Tommy News wrote: >> From our friend Karl: >> >> "What I don't understand about what Mr Neusner said (and I fully >> subscribe to his outrage about Moose-woman's use of such an >> outrageously derogatory term) is his statement that Moose-woman was >> "maligned in a gross and unfair way." It was Moose-woman's >> organization which prepared the ad that had the "crosshairs map," it >> was Moose-woman's organization which, after the shooting of the >> Congresswoman, quickly removed the words "crosshairs map" from the >> crosshairs map, and it is the Moose-woman's organization and its >> lapdogs in the media (viz Rush Limbaugh's comment about killing all >> the liberals except two so that they can be used as museum pieces) >> which have been fomenting the violence which eventually erupted in >> Tucson. Whether or not the nutcase in Tucson was or was not involved >> in "partisan politics," the fact is that he acted in a climate which >> has become terribly poisonous in sociopolitical terms, and that is a >> turd, if you will forgive me, which needs to be laid right on the >> front porch of Moose-woman and her cohorts. No "gross and unfair" >> maligning has occurred. I have said it before, and I will say it >> again -- Moose-woman needs to be hauled into court as an accessory and >> conspirator to murder and attempted murder." >> >> On 1/12/11, Tommy News<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sarah Palin: The "Blood Libel" in Tucson mass shooting is on Her Own >>> Hands, but is also on ours. >>> >>> In Palin's version of events, her controversial actions represented >>> common cause with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who a few days >>> before being critically wounded in the mass shooting had read the >>> First Amendment on the House floor. >>> >>> "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," Palin said in the >>> statement. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not >>> collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who >>> listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both >>> sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully >>> exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with >>> those who proudly voted in the last election." >>> >>> Palin's statement contained an instance of provocative religious >>> imagery that might be missed by more secular voters who read her >>> statement, but which likely will be recognized by the religious >>> conservatives who constitute such an important part of her following. >>> >>> Within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should >>> not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very >>> hatred and violence they purport to condemn," she wrote. "That is >>> reprehensible." >>> >>> "Blood libel" is a phrase that refers to a centuries-old anti-Semitic >>> slander - the false charge that Jews use the blood of Christian >>> children for rituals - that has been used as an excuse for >>> persecution. The phrase was first used in connection with response to >>> the Arizona shootings in an opinion piece in Monday's Wall Street >>> Journal and has been picked up by others on the right. >>> >>> Palin's defensiveness was apparent in the indirect reference to >>> criticism of a map on Palin's Web site during the midterm elections >>> that showed districts of congressional Democrats she had targeted for >>> defeat marked with crosshairs. >>> >>> Giffords, whose district was one of those 20, had publicly complained >>> that this was an invitation to violence. >>> >>> Palin's statement comes as President Obama is headed to Tucson to >>> speak at a service for the victims, and guarantees that her >>> perspective will be part of the storyline of the day. >>> >>> In its careful timing and deliberate language, it also represents a >>> departure from her previous attention-getting Facebook posts and >>> tweets, many of which were reflexive spasms to even small criticisms. >>> >>> On Thanksgiving, for instance, as most of the nation was still >>> sleepily digesting turkey dinners, she issued an angry blast at Obama >>> and the media, recalling a gaffe the president made during the 2008 >>> campaign. It was an apparent reaction to the fact that she herself had >>> been ridiculed for a slip of the tongue in which she referred to North >>> Korea as South Korea. >>> >>> "The one-word slip occurred yesterday during one of my seven >>> back-to-back interviews wherein I was privileged to speak to the >>> American public about the important, world-changing issues before us," >>> Palin wrote. "If the media had bothered to actually listen to all of >>> my remarks on Glenn Beck's radio show, they would have noticed that I >>> refer to South Korea as our ally throughout, that I corrected myself >>> seconds after my slip-of-the-tongue, and that I made it abundantly >>> clear that pressure should be put on China to restrict energy exports >>> to the North Korean regime." >>> >>> Those kinds of outbursts could be fatal in a presidential campaign, >>> and stand as a stark contrast to the statement that Palin released >>> Wednesday. >>> >>> Source: >>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/12/AR2011011202145.html?hpid=topnews >>> >>> Is Sarah Palin to Blame for the Tucson Shootings or Are We All? >>> >>> The Washington Post and numerous other news agencies are discussing a >>> potential connection between a graphic released by Sarah Palin's Take >>> Back the 20 campaign and the Jan. 8 shooting of Arizona >>> Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords is in intensive care as a result of >>> Jared Loughner's one-man rampage that left six people dead and 14 >>> injured. The graphic in question was used in the 2010 midterm >>> elections. It featured 20 crosshairs with each set meant to denote a >>> seat up for re-election that was held by representatives who voted for >>> health care reform. Crosshairs covered Giffords' district. >>> >>> Almost immediately after the shooting, the media picked up the story >>> of Palin's map and it targeting Giffords' congressional seat. At >>> first, Palin did not address this part of the developing story in >>> Tucson and instead extended condolences to Giffords' family and the >>> families of the other victims via her Facebook page on Saturday >>> afternoon, according to TMZ. >>> >>> However, members of Palin's political action committee did offer >>> commentary by suggesting that the markings were denoting a map >>> location. But when messages were released by Palin promoting the >>> graphic, she used the words "Don't Retreat -- Instead RELOAD." >>> >>> A map is not reloaded. A gun is reloaded. >>> >>> Because of this graphic and the word choices that followed its issue, >>> are Palin and the tea party movement somehow responsible for the >>> shooting of Giffords and innocent bystanders at her public meeting in >>> Tucson? >>> >>> The answer is "Yes." They are responsible. But they are only >>> responsible to the extent that every American who engages in partisan >>> politics is responsible. The level of American political discourse has >>> trickled down from a creation point of heated debate with an air of >>> respect to a cesspool of rhetoric best encapsulated in the phrase "You >>> are either for us, or you are against us." >>> >>> More: >>> http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html >>> -- >>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>> Have a great day, >>> Tommy >>> >> > > -- > *This is my life. I make the rules.* > > *"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly > falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly > be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so > willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that > this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement." > - Étienne de la Boétie* > > *Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who > send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Jurisdictionary > <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> was created by a > lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by > controlling judges and lawyers!* > > *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal > Government* > *Read the US Constitution > <http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends>* > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
