Palin is offensive every time she opens her squeaky snarky mouth and spews out her small-minded rants and bumper sticker slogans. You Betcha!
On 1/14/11, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > Palin said nothing that offended anyone except those "progressives" who > believe that they exemplify decorum, civility, and are somehow more > enlightened than the rest of us. > > Thankfully, Americans have seen through the likes of Paul Krugman, Nanc > Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, President Obama, and especially > Moonbats like TommyTomTomForNews. > > Again, those on the far left are just so bitter, angry and hate filled that > their dream "March to Utopia" has failed....Their ten minutes of fame is > over, and they are pissed!! *See* TommyTomTomForNews. > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Ashley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> So, let me understand this: It's okay for Progressives to use derogatory >> words, but it's not okay for anyone else. Is that what you are saying, >> Tommy? >> >> >> On 1/14/2011 5:33 PM, Tommy News wrote: >> >> The self described simple-minded "Pitbull in Lipstick" deserves to be >> called "Moose-Woman". >> >> The article is not "crap", and it can be found here as the source link >> above shows. To >> repeat:http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html >> >> On 1/14/11, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So, let me understand this. "Blood Libel" is a derogatory term but >> "Moose-woman" isn't? >> >> Tommy, where do you find this crap? >> >> On 1/14/2011 5:36 AM, Tommy News wrote: >> >> From our friend Karl: >> >> "What I don't understand about what Mr Neusner said (and I fully >> subscribe to his outrage about Moose-woman's use of such an >> outrageously derogatory term) is his statement that Moose-woman was >> "maligned in a gross and unfair way." It was Moose-woman's >> organization which prepared the ad that had the "crosshairs map," it >> was Moose-woman's organization which, after the shooting of the >> Congresswoman, quickly removed the words "crosshairs map" from the >> crosshairs map, and it is the Moose-woman's organization and its >> lapdogs in the media (viz Rush Limbaugh's comment about killing all >> the liberals except two so that they can be used as museum pieces) >> which have been fomenting the violence which eventually erupted in >> Tucson. Whether or not the nutcase in Tucson was or was not involved >> in "partisan politics," the fact is that he acted in a climate which >> has become terribly poisonous in sociopolitical terms, and that is a >> turd, if you will forgive me, which needs to be laid right on the >> front porch of Moose-woman and her cohorts. No "gross and unfair" >> maligning has occurred. I have said it before, and I will say it >> again -- Moose-woman needs to be hauled into court as an accessory and >> conspirator to murder and attempted murder." >> >> On 1/12/11, Tommy News<[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Sarah Palin: The "Blood Libel" in Tucson mass shooting is on Her Own >> Hands, but is also on ours. >> >> In Palin's version of events, her controversial actions represented >> common cause with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who a few days >> before being critically wounded in the mass shooting had read the >> First Amendment on the House floor. >> >> "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," Palin said in the >> statement. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not >> collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who >> listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both >> sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully >> exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with >> those who proudly voted in the last election." >> >> Palin's statement contained an instance of provocative religious >> imagery that might be missed by more secular voters who read her >> statement, but which likely will be recognized by the religious >> conservatives who constitute such an important part of her following. >> >> Within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should >> not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very >> hatred and violence they purport to condemn," she wrote. "That is >> reprehensible." >> >> "Blood libel" is a phrase that refers to a centuries-old anti-Semitic >> slander - the false charge that Jews use the blood of Christian >> children for rituals - that has been used as an excuse for >> persecution. The phrase was first used in connection with response to >> the Arizona shootings in an opinion piece in Monday's Wall Street >> Journal and has been picked up by others on the right. >> >> Palin's defensiveness was apparent in the indirect reference to >> criticism of a map on Palin's Web site during the midterm elections >> that showed districts of congressional Democrats she had targeted for >> defeat marked with crosshairs. >> >> Giffords, whose district was one of those 20, had publicly complained >> that this was an invitation to violence. >> >> Palin's statement comes as President Obama is headed to Tucson to >> speak at a service for the victims, and guarantees that her >> perspective will be part of the storyline of the day. >> >> In its careful timing and deliberate language, it also represents a >> departure from her previous attention-getting Facebook posts and >> tweets, many of which were reflexive spasms to even small criticisms. >> >> On Thanksgiving, for instance, as most of the nation was still >> sleepily digesting turkey dinners, she issued an angry blast at Obama >> and the media, recalling a gaffe the president made during the 2008 >> campaign. It was an apparent reaction to the fact that she herself had >> been ridiculed for a slip of the tongue in which she referred to North >> Korea as South Korea. >> >> "The one-word slip occurred yesterday during one of my seven >> back-to-back interviews wherein I was privileged to speak to the >> American public about the important, world-changing issues before us," >> Palin wrote. "If the media had bothered to actually listen to all of >> my remarks on Glenn Beck's radio show, they would have noticed that I >> refer to South Korea as our ally throughout, that I corrected myself >> seconds after my slip-of-the-tongue, and that I made it abundantly >> clear that pressure should be put on China to restrict energy exports >> to the North Korean regime." >> >> Those kinds of outbursts could be fatal in a presidential campaign, >> and stand as a stark contrast to the statement that Palin released >> Wednesday. >> >> Source:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/12/AR2011011202145.html?hpid=topnews >> >> Is Sarah Palin to Blame for the Tucson Shootings or Are We All? >> >> The Washington Post and numerous other news agencies are discussing a >> potential connection between a graphic released by Sarah Palin's Take >> Back the 20 campaign and the Jan. 8 shooting of Arizona >> Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords is in intensive care as a result of >> Jared Loughner's one-man rampage that left six people dead and 14 >> injured. The graphic in question was used in the 2010 midterm >> elections. It featured 20 crosshairs with each set meant to denote a >> seat up for re-election that was held by representatives who voted for >> health care reform. Crosshairs covered Giffords' district. >> >> Almost immediately after the shooting, the media picked up the story >> of Palin's map and it targeting Giffords' congressional seat. At >> first, Palin did not address this part of the developing story in >> Tucson and instead extended condolences to Giffords' family and the >> families of the other victims via her Facebook page on Saturday >> afternoon, according to TMZ. >> >> However, members of Palin's political action committee did offer >> commentary by suggesting that the markings were denoting a map >> location. But when messages were released by Palin promoting the >> graphic, she used the words "Don't Retreat -- Instead RELOAD." >> >> A map is not reloaded. A gun is reloaded. >> >> Because of this graphic and the word choices that followed its issue, >> are Palin and the tea party movement somehow responsible for the >> shooting of Giffords and innocent bystanders at her public meeting in >> Tucson? >> >> The answer is "Yes." They are responsible. But they are only >> responsible to the extent that every American who engages in partisan >> politics is responsible. The level of American political discourse has >> trickled down from a creation point of heated debate with an air of >> respect to a cesspool of rhetoric best encapsulated in the phrase "You >> are either for us, or you are against us." >> >> More:http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html >> -- >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> Have a great day, >> Tommy >> >> >> -- >> *This is my life. I make the rules.* >> >> *"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly >> falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly >> be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so >> willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that >> this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement." >> - Étienne de la Boétie* >> >> *Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who >> send out emails or hold weekend seminars! >> Jurisdictionary<http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> >> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004> was created by a >> lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by >> controlling judges and lawyers!* >> >> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal >> Government* >> *Read the US >> Constitution<http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends> >> <http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends>* >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> >> -- >> *This is my life. I make the rules.* >> >> *"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly >> falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly >> be >> roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly >> that >> one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has not >> so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement." >> - Étienne de la Boétie* >> >> *Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who >> send out emails or hold weekend seminars! >> Jurisdictionary<http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>was >> created by a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning >> lawsuits by controlling judges and lawyers!* >> >> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal >> Government* >> *Read the US >> Constitution<http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends> >> * >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
