And Lil' Tommy just proved our point Dick! Read his last little ditty in this thread!
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:54 AM, dick thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > her only offense is in making common sense remarks that you and your > buddies can't refute (or refudiate). > > > On 01/14/2011 09:49 PM, Tommy News wrote: > >> Palin is offensive every time she opens her squeaky snarky mouth and >> spews out her small-minded rants and bumper sticker slogans. You >> Betcha! >> >> >> On 1/14/11, Keith In Köln<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Palin said nothing that offended anyone except those "progressives" who >>> believe that they exemplify decorum, civility, and are somehow more >>> enlightened than the rest of us. >>> >>> Thankfully, Americans have seen through the likes of Paul Krugman, Nanc >>> Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, President Obama, and especially >>> Moonbats like TommyTomTomForNews. >>> >>> Again, those on the far left are just so bitter, angry and hate filled >>> that >>> their dream "March to Utopia" has failed....Their ten minutes of fame is >>> over, and they are pissed!! *See* TommyTomTomForNews. >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Ashley< >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So, let me understand this: It's okay for Progressives to use derogatory >>>> words, but it's not okay for anyone else. Is that what you are saying, >>>> Tommy? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/14/2011 5:33 PM, Tommy News wrote: >>>> >>>> The self described simple-minded "Pitbull in Lipstick" deserves to be >>>> called "Moose-Woman". >>>> >>>> The article is not "crap", and it can be found here as the source link >>>> above shows. To >>>> repeat: >>>> http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html >>>> >>>> On 1/14/11, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> So, let me understand this. "Blood Libel" is a derogatory term but >>>> "Moose-woman" isn't? >>>> >>>> Tommy, where do you find this crap? >>>> >>>> On 1/14/2011 5:36 AM, Tommy News wrote: >>>> >>>> From our friend Karl: >>>> >>>> "What I don't understand about what Mr Neusner said (and I fully >>>> subscribe to his outrage about Moose-woman's use of such an >>>> outrageously derogatory term) is his statement that Moose-woman was >>>> "maligned in a gross and unfair way." It was Moose-woman's >>>> organization which prepared the ad that had the "crosshairs map," it >>>> was Moose-woman's organization which, after the shooting of the >>>> Congresswoman, quickly removed the words "crosshairs map" from the >>>> crosshairs map, and it is the Moose-woman's organization and its >>>> lapdogs in the media (viz Rush Limbaugh's comment about killing all >>>> the liberals except two so that they can be used as museum pieces) >>>> which have been fomenting the violence which eventually erupted in >>>> Tucson. Whether or not the nutcase in Tucson was or was not involved >>>> in "partisan politics," the fact is that he acted in a climate which >>>> has become terribly poisonous in sociopolitical terms, and that is a >>>> turd, if you will forgive me, which needs to be laid right on the >>>> front porch of Moose-woman and her cohorts. No "gross and unfair" >>>> maligning has occurred. I have said it before, and I will say it >>>> again -- Moose-woman needs to be hauled into court as an accessory and >>>> conspirator to murder and attempted murder." >>>> >>>> On 1/12/11, Tommy News<[email protected]> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sarah Palin: The "Blood Libel" in Tucson mass shooting is on Her Own >>>> Hands, but is also on ours. >>>> >>>> In Palin's version of events, her controversial actions represented >>>> common cause with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who a few days >>>> before being critically wounded in the mass shooting had read the >>>> First Amendment on the House floor. >>>> >>>> "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," Palin said in the >>>> statement. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not >>>> collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who >>>> listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both >>>> sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully >>>> exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with >>>> those who proudly voted in the last election." >>>> >>>> Palin's statement contained an instance of provocative religious >>>> imagery that might be missed by more secular voters who read her >>>> statement, but which likely will be recognized by the religious >>>> conservatives who constitute such an important part of her following. >>>> >>>> Within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should >>>> not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very >>>> hatred and violence they purport to condemn," she wrote. "That is >>>> reprehensible." >>>> >>>> "Blood libel" is a phrase that refers to a centuries-old anti-Semitic >>>> slander - the false charge that Jews use the blood of Christian >>>> children for rituals - that has been used as an excuse for >>>> persecution. The phrase was first used in connection with response to >>>> the Arizona shootings in an opinion piece in Monday's Wall Street >>>> Journal and has been picked up by others on the right. >>>> >>>> Palin's defensiveness was apparent in the indirect reference to >>>> criticism of a map on Palin's Web site during the midterm elections >>>> that showed districts of congressional Democrats she had targeted for >>>> defeat marked with crosshairs. >>>> >>>> Giffords, whose district was one of those 20, had publicly complained >>>> that this was an invitation to violence. >>>> >>>> Palin's statement comes as President Obama is headed to Tucson to >>>> speak at a service for the victims, and guarantees that her >>>> perspective will be part of the storyline of the day. >>>> >>>> In its careful timing and deliberate language, it also represents a >>>> departure from her previous attention-getting Facebook posts and >>>> tweets, many of which were reflexive spasms to even small criticisms. >>>> >>>> On Thanksgiving, for instance, as most of the nation was still >>>> sleepily digesting turkey dinners, she issued an angry blast at Obama >>>> and the media, recalling a gaffe the president made during the 2008 >>>> campaign. It was an apparent reaction to the fact that she herself had >>>> been ridiculed for a slip of the tongue in which she referred to North >>>> Korea as South Korea. >>>> >>>> "The one-word slip occurred yesterday during one of my seven >>>> back-to-back interviews wherein I was privileged to speak to the >>>> American public about the important, world-changing issues before us," >>>> Palin wrote. "If the media had bothered to actually listen to all of >>>> my remarks on Glenn Beck's radio show, they would have noticed that I >>>> refer to South Korea as our ally throughout, that I corrected myself >>>> seconds after my slip-of-the-tongue, and that I made it abundantly >>>> clear that pressure should be put on China to restrict energy exports >>>> to the North Korean regime." >>>> >>>> Those kinds of outbursts could be fatal in a presidential campaign, >>>> and stand as a stark contrast to the statement that Palin released >>>> Wednesday. >>>> >>>> Source: >>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/12/AR2011011202145.html?hpid=topnews >>>> >>>> Is Sarah Palin to Blame for the Tucson Shootings or Are We All? >>>> >>>> The Washington Post and numerous other news agencies are discussing a >>>> potential connection between a graphic released by Sarah Palin's Take >>>> Back the 20 campaign and the Jan. 8 shooting of Arizona >>>> Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords is in intensive care as a result of >>>> Jared Loughner's one-man rampage that left six people dead and 14 >>>> injured. The graphic in question was used in the 2010 midterm >>>> elections. It featured 20 crosshairs with each set meant to denote a >>>> seat up for re-election that was held by representatives who voted for >>>> health care reform. Crosshairs covered Giffords' district. >>>> >>>> Almost immediately after the shooting, the media picked up the story >>>> of Palin's map and it targeting Giffords' congressional seat. At >>>> first, Palin did not address this part of the developing story in >>>> Tucson and instead extended condolences to Giffords' family and the >>>> families of the other victims via her Facebook page on Saturday >>>> afternoon, according to TMZ. >>>> >>>> However, members of Palin's political action committee did offer >>>> commentary by suggesting that the markings were denoting a map >>>> location. But when messages were released by Palin promoting the >>>> graphic, she used the words "Don't Retreat -- Instead RELOAD." >>>> >>>> A map is not reloaded. A gun is reloaded. >>>> >>>> Because of this graphic and the word choices that followed its issue, >>>> are Palin and the tea party movement somehow responsible for the >>>> shooting of Giffords and innocent bystanders at her public meeting in >>>> Tucson? >>>> >>>> The answer is "Yes." They are responsible. But they are only >>>> responsible to the extent that every American who engages in partisan >>>> politics is responsible. The level of American political discourse has >>>> trickled down from a creation point of heated debate with an air of >>>> respect to a cesspool of rhetoric best encapsulated in the phrase "You >>>> are either for us, or you are against us." >>>> >>>> More: >>>> http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html >>>> -- >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>>> Have a great day, >>>> Tommy >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *This is my life. I make the rules.* >>>> >>>> *"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly >>>> falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly >>>> be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so >>>> willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that >>>> this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement." >>>> - Étienne de la Boétie* >>>> >>>> *Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who >>>> send out emails or hold weekend seminars! >>>> Jurisdictionary<http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004<http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004> >>>> > >>>> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004> was created by a >>>> lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by >>>> controlling judges and lawyers!* >>>> >>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal >>>> Government* >>>> *Read the US >>>> Constitution< >>>> http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends >>>> > >>>> < >>>> http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends >>>> >* >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at >>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *This is my life. I make the rules.* >>>> >>>> *"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly >>>> falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly >>>> be >>>> roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly >>>> that >>>> one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has >>>> not >>>> so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement." >>>> - Étienne de la Boétie* >>>> >>>> *Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who >>>> send out emails or hold weekend seminars! >>>> Jurisdictionary<http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=CG0004>was >>>> created by a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning >>>> lawsuits by controlling judges and lawyers!* >>>> >>>> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal >>>> Government* >>>> *Read the US >>>> Constitution< >>>> http://amgona.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=7#Amends >>>> > >>>> * >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at >>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/>< >>>> http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> * It's active > and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the > latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
