Hello John! Who was the Senator, and what felonious act did he do?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Readers: > > It continues to enlighten me how “right-on” many of my previous > essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been. Here is > one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an > admirable public figure: > > 6/24/08 > > TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA. > > Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a > lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’ > leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as > they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on > the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated > those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson > Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged. > > While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on > felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators. > Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept > trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the- > core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’ > aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other > citizens. > > Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news > stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included > pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But > Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I > contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who > isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must > pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It > is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the > top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert > as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the > Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias and > egotistical elitism. > > The media is comforted by its united front. These days, there are no > maverick investigative reporters. I should know; I’ve looked high and > low! CNN contributor, Carl Bernstein, once made a splash by helping > to break Watergate. But he won’t make ‘a ripple’, now, to let it be > told that I have disproved Einstein’s theories of relativity. And > Bernstein isn’t interested in breaking a story—much more important > than Watergate ever was—that none of the twenty plus universities > which I have contacted care to correct the errors in their teaching > which the trusting public just assumes are error free. In effect, the > media is protecting the status quo both in government, and in > education. And that is why the media is the one ‘institution’ most > threatening to the survival of the USA. It is even MORE threatening > than all of our failed governments combined! > > In addition to my seeking justice via the media for my injuries due to > that… US senator, I also tried to seek justice by contacting the likes > of Al Gore, while he was President of the Senate. And I contacted the > US Justice Department, and eventually, the Chief Justice of the US > Supreme Court. None of those, and dozens more like them, care to hold > any public figure accountable for felonious acts. Such a realization > is what prompted me to write a New Constitution. The primary purpose > of such is to kick out the rascals in Washington, a little at a time, > by restricting our representatives—other than our President and V. > Pres.—to those who have NEVER held any public office at the local, > state, or federal levels. Career politicians are verboten! > > George W. Bush is a lame duck whose public esteem is about as low as > it can go. But to his credit, Bush is one of the best from-the-heart > speakers. The man has great speech writers. Even though the words he > expresses aren‘t always his own, his comments seem genuine—like he > cares. I admit that I don’t listen anytime that Bush talks about… his > war. His caring, there, is less than ideal. But if I could go hiking > or fishing with Bush, that would be something special. > > Part of the reason George Bush ‘won’ in 2000 was because he got the > endorsement of that felonious US senator whom I’ve alluded to, above. > Bush praised that senator, even after I had written to Bush—as I did > to every state governor in the USA, apprising him, and all of them, of > the senator’s apt crime(s). Apparently, politicians, and the media, > are more than willing to look the other way to the wrongful acts of > public figures. They seem to know, intuitively, that their own > chances of escaping civil retribution for bad deeds goes way up if > they will only look-the-other-way to the wrongs done by public > figures. > > After George W. Bush failed to act morally regarding that felonious > senator, I immediately wrote to Senator John McCain. I informed > McCain that he could easily win the Republican nomination if he would > just explain to the media that Bush had knowingly praised and embraced > a felonious senator. I don’t know what… ‘dirt’ the Republican party > had on McCain, but he passed up the last and the best hope he has ever > had to become President… and that was before the loss of much of his > mental wherewithal—which will prevent him from winning the present > presidential race. > > I’ve had, perhaps, ’the scoop’ of the century regarding that senator. > And I’ve had the scientific achievement of the century by disproving > Einstein. Recently, I’ve begun to reveal details concerning my labor- > of-love New Constitution. Such has been inspired to correct our > nation’s problems, and in ways that will be most advantageous to the > American People. Incredibly, none of those things, or all three > combined, rises to the threshold of being even “fifteen minutes” of… > news, Because of our corrupt media, America is in big trouble—very big > trouble! > > Tim Russert, and his ilk, got or get, personal enjoyment from making > others be uncomfortable, because of pointed questions or comments. A > real gentleman wouldn’t do that. There was something in Russet’s > ‘value system’ that just wasn’t right. That’s why I listed him, > first, of those anti-democracy media figures who should face > retribution for their crimes. It has been said that Russert had > enthusiasm. But his enthusiasm was, quite simply, for doing the wrong > things in his job; doing things not in the best interest of the > country; and getting paid a huge salary to do so. Past ‘monetary > compensation’ won’t stand anyone in good stead at the Pearly Gates. > > George Carlin, bless his soul, had more vision for how America should > be than any politician in Washington, or any media icon! The man > perceived truths! Very few people can do that so insightfully, for so > long, and with such fervor. His shoes will be very difficult ones to > fill. > > The ruinous media keeps right on doing their 24/7 “nothings” that they > pass off as… news. Thinking Americans everywhere should wake up and > realize how hugely biased the media is toward the status quo. If any > of you are craving listening to talk, turn to the public radio and TV > stations. To begin to save the last hope for America: democracy, by > all means, STOP REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don’t give the > ubiquitous media fools any ’scores’ to justify their commenting > regarding politics, or anything else, as in Ballot Bowl or etc. > Politics is NOT a game! > > Hopefully, Barack Obama is the last of a long line of political two- > faces. He has never reached a high enough moral plateau to qualify to > be President. He didn’t treat Clinton with the respect that she > deserved; and he didn’t honor simple principles of democracy regarding > the FL and MI primaries. Those two things, and others, show that > Obama is unprincipled. He likes anything—corrupt or not—that improves > his chances of winning. People who think like that are the exact ones > my New Constitution will send packing. The main ‘changes’ that the > USA needs are as simple as straightening out the ‘quality of the > personnel’ that we hire to work for us in Washington, and in our local > and state governments. > > Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!” > Pass it on! > > Respectfully submitted, > > > — NoEinstein — (AKA John A. Armistead) > > > > > On Jan 28, 2:01 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Folks: The details concerning my "briefs" to Chief Justice John > > G. Roberts, Jr. about the disqualifying aspects of having Barack Obama > > become President, are included in numbers of essays that I wrote > > leading up to the 2008 Election. In looking back at those, most > > continue to be quite apt as we consider how best to save the USA. > > Here is one those, I think, interesting essays: > > > > 9/04/08 > > > > MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA! > > > > If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited > > last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this > > country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn’t signify that there is > > less POWER in “the weaker sex”, it just differentiates the Hockey Moms > > from the Pit Bulls! > > > > At last week’s Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked > > the throng, “Are you ready to take back this country?” That question > > seemed to imply that Obama’s motive for ‘change’ is to wrest the > > control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and > > return control to the People. On that one goal Obama and I agree—The > > PEOPLE SHOULD BE IN CONTROL! That said, having Barack Obama be > > elected President would be THE most catastrophic thing to happen to > > this country, 9/11 included… > > > > As was highlighted by Republicans last night, Barack Obama has ZERO > > executive experience. He’s running to be President because his > > lifelong inferiority complex—caused by to his being biracial; ’poor’; > > and brought up without a father—demands to be compensated. When more > > and more Blacks began identifying with Obama’s angry tone of speech, > > even while he was still in his teens, Obama began being hyped by > > Blacks as their future leader. With each public speech that he > > delivered, his ego swelled. Eventually, he deluded himself into > > believing that he’s entitled to be President. The country owes him > > such, simply because of his sad childhood. > > > > Obama’s undeserved rise to power was bolstered by the deeply corrupt > > Democratic Party. Such was needing a Manchurian Candidate—without the > > independence of the Clintons—who would be the puppet of Howard Dean > > and his band of thieves. Those like Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle and > > Bob Casey endorsed Obama, not because he’s exceptional, but because > > he’s unexceptional enough to be needing them to help him “run things” > > in Washington. Take away the implied rewards for those endorsing > > Obama, and the endorsements would have been few, indeed. > > > > For the record, my New Constitution requires that any civil employee > > or office holder be fired for publicly endorsing a candidate for > > government office. That stipulation will stop the you-owe-me-one > > obligations, once in office, which have so compromised candidates’ > > ability to do their jobs of representing the People. > > > > Screaming Howard Dean, the DNC Chairman, knows that he himself will > > never be President. But that hasn’t stopped Dean from lusting to have > > as much behind-the-scenes power in the White House as he can muster. > > Up until Dean “lost it” in 2004, he had been incredibly successful at > > generating ideological and financial support over the Internet. > > Barack Obama has followed Dean’s example—perhaps under Dean’s tutorage— > > to gain “grass roots” support via the Internet. Very early, 90 plus > > percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be “compensated”, > > too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with > > their relentless neighborhood recruitments of voters, and new > > registrants to vote… for Obama. The latter is a tacit violation of > > principles of democracy. > > > > A Black man who was interviewed in Time Square right after Obama’s > > acceptance of his party’s nomination, sounded proud as he said, “This > > year I contributed $50.00 to Obama. Obama won’t accept contributions > > from special interests.” Well, I’ve got news for you: Blacks ARE a > > special interest! And they are a hugely threatening one to the future > > of the USA! > > > > If Blacks manage to win “the game” of getting Obama elected, there > > will be in-your-face celebrating. Right off the bat, Blacks will be > > expecting to see the last vestiges of racial discrimination end. They > > will be expecting to have their lot in life be improved, yesterday— > > because they are Black—and that is the worst form of racism. There > > will be violence from Blacks when they aren’t as empowered by Obama’s > > election as they had hoped. And there will be violence from whites if > > Blacks are empowered, inequitably. The Democrats and Obama have > > gotten this country into a lose/lose situation if Obama gets elected. > > The Watts Riots will look like soccer celebrations by comparison. > > > > Sarah Palin is a Breath of Fresh Air (!) in the midst of the dire > > situation that the USA finds itself in. If John McCain, the current > > standard bearer of the Republican Party, becomes President, our broken > > and corrupt “two party” government will be sitting there, unscathed. > > Yes, McCain is a maverick who sticks to his principles. And even > > though Palin is a “barracuda”, the US Constitution doesn’t grant the > > Executive Office the POWER necessary to implement the changes that > > need to be made in our government. > > > > Sarah Palin is a genuine gold nugget charmer! But it pains my heart > > to have such a HOPEFUL PRESENCE as she be sacrificed against the > > Calcified Wall of Corruption that is our Congress. > > > > However, Sarah Palin need not be sacrificed! To save both McCain and > > her from failure in ‘correcting’ our government, all that McCain and > > she need to do is to: Publicly acknowledge that it is PRUDENT to let > > the American People vote on my democracy-based New Constitution, in > > November of 2010! By making just that one simple acknowledgment, > > Congress, and the World, will be put on notice that the American > > People are determined to take back control of government. For much > > too long political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the “great > > traditions” of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same > > old ineffectual things. > > > > Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government; > > and anti taxes. But as long as we’re in debt—and we are, big time, > > because of Bush’s wars—taxes can’t be lowered much. On a positive > > note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local, > > state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of > > the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%. > > Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be > > reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this > > country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And > > never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the > > People captive, simply because the People are too law abiding. > > > > This week on CNN’s ‘Larry King Live’, Jesse Ventura tells us that he > > wants to be a player in this country’s… Revolution. Ventura says that > > he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican. > > Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks > > that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he’ll run as an > > Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking > > control of our (party-dominated) governments. > > > > Because of the above, and individual observations, too, thinking > > Americans, everywhere, should realize: The major changes needed in our > > government will require tearing down and rebuilding from the ground > > up. But the Plans and Specifications to do so are poised and > > polished. People, start DEMANDING to learn more about my New > > Constitution! The media is giving hints that it can’t keep its > > collective heads buried-in-the-sand much longer regarding the prospect > > of there being a New Constitution. > > > > One day, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will make a great first woman > > President of the United States of America. To help assure that such a > > goal isn’t an impossible one for her, simply realize: “A New > > Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on! > > > > Respectfully submitted, > > > > — NoEinstein — > > > > On Jan 26, 5:59 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The recent ‘State of the Union Address’ highlights why “saving our > > > government” in its present form is counterproductive. Hundreds of > > > dolled-out men and women in Congress—by their attendance at the address > > > —paid homage to that squatting dictator, Indonesian, socialist- > > > communist Barack Obama. Though the group was supposedly mixed-up > > > (They are “that”, too.), people stood on command to have the Anti- > > > Christ, Obama, be greeted like a rock star. He found willing hands to > > > shake along the ‘aisle’, that was somehow populated by his most doting > > > supporters. From appearances, alone, Obama seemed like an entering > > > hero, rather than THE most corrupt and hurtful-to-America person in > > > the entire history of this country! > > > > > Our should-be-cherished American Flag, in that House Chamber, was > > > desecrated by having Barack Obama stand in front of it—like he does at > > > every public appearance that he makes. The wrong public perception is > > > that elected officials, fraudulent Presidents, and our corrupt > > > government are synonymous with the USA. But nothing could be further > > > from the truth! The USA is “We, the People”, NOT they, the > > > controlling government! > > > > > “The federal government shall not be considered to be synonymous with > > > the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor are they > > > dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall be > > > answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens thereof.” > > > > > “The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue. > > > Only when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the > > > nation or appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
