Dear Keith: Realize that I am a person with dozens of irons-in-the-fire. My primary focus on the groups has to be "talking-up" my New Constitution; and "talking-up" my New Science, which finally UNIFIES the laws of nature, and without using the lame... crutch of space- time. I simply don't have time to entertain you or others with some of the travesty in my earlier life. Obviously, that stuff must have been pretty serious to inspire me to spend fourteen plus years writing The New Constitution of the United States of America.
Back in 1996 I decided to take my uncovered News Story directly to the people. I summarized my story on a small-print, closely-spaced, legal size sheet. I passed out several hundred of those copies in the upstate, and got "detained" by police in a Greenville mall. You might say, I know first hand about the corruption rampant in this country. Numbers of things in my New Constitution have been put there, specifically, to make sure no law abiding citizen in the USA is ever treated like a criminal for wanting to spill-the-beans on someone in public office. I would welcome having any of you people out there, with a copy, posting such disclosure "about that senator" on line. As long as I'm not distracted from my present goals, I'll be happy. — NoEinstein — On Jan 29, 7:43 pm, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello John! > > Who was the Senator, and what felonious act did he do? > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Readers: > > > It continues to enlighten me how “right-on” many of my previous > > essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been. Here is > > one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an > > admirable public figure: > > > 6/24/08 > > > TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA. > > > Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a > > lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’ > > leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as > > they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on > > the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated > > those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson > > Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged. > > > While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on > > felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators. > > Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept > > trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the- > > core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’ > > aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other > > citizens. > > > Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news > > stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included > > pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But > > Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I > > contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who > > isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must > > pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It > > is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the > > top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert > > as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the > > Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias and > > egotistical elitism. > > > The media is comforted by its united front. These days, there are no > > maverick investigative reporters. I should know; I’ve looked high and > > low! CNN contributor, Carl Bernstein, once made a splash by helping > > to break Watergate. But he won’t make ‘a ripple’, now, to let it be > > told that I have disproved Einstein’s theories of relativity. And > > Bernstein isn’t interested in breaking a story—much more important > > than Watergate ever was—that none of the twenty plus universities > > which I have contacted care to correct the errors in their teaching > > which the trusting public just assumes are error free. In effect, the > > media is protecting the status quo both in government, and in > > education. And that is why the media is the one ‘institution’ most > > threatening to the survival of the USA. It is even MORE threatening > > than all of our failed governments combined! > > > In addition to my seeking justice via the media for my injuries due to > > that… US senator, I also tried to seek justice by contacting the likes > > of Al Gore, while he was President of the Senate. And I contacted the > > US Justice Department, and eventually, the Chief Justice of the US > > Supreme Court. None of those, and dozens more like them, care to hold > > any public figure accountable for felonious acts. Such a realization > > is what prompted me to write a New Constitution. The primary purpose > > of such is to kick out the rascals in Washington, a little at a time, > > by restricting our representatives—other than our President and V. > > Pres.—to those who have NEVER held any public office at the local, > > state, or federal levels. Career politicians are verboten! > > > George W. Bush is a lame duck whose public esteem is about as low as > > it can go. But to his credit, Bush is one of the best from-the-heart > > speakers. The man has great speech writers. Even though the words he > > expresses aren‘t always his own, his comments seem genuine—like he > > cares. I admit that I don’t listen anytime that Bush talks about… his > > war. His caring, there, is less than ideal. But if I could go hiking > > or fishing with Bush, that would be something special. > > > Part of the reason George Bush ‘won’ in 2000 was because he got the > > endorsement of that felonious US senator whom I’ve alluded to, above. > > Bush praised that senator, even after I had written to Bush—as I did > > to every state governor in the USA, apprising him, and all of them, of > > the senator’s apt crime(s). Apparently, politicians, and the media, > > are more than willing to look the other way to the wrongful acts of > > public figures. They seem to know, intuitively, that their own > > chances of escaping civil retribution for bad deeds goes way up if > > they will only look-the-other-way to the wrongs done by public > > figures. > > > After George W. Bush failed to act morally regarding that felonious > > senator, I immediately wrote to Senator John McCain. I informed > > McCain that he could easily win the Republican nomination if he would > > just explain to the media that Bush had knowingly praised and embraced > > a felonious senator. I don’t know what… ‘dirt’ the Republican party > > had on McCain, but he passed up the last and the best hope he has ever > > had to become President… and that was before the loss of much of his > > mental wherewithal—which will prevent him from winning the present > > presidential race. > > > I’ve had, perhaps, ’the scoop’ of the century regarding that senator. > > And I’ve had the scientific achievement of the century by disproving > > Einstein. Recently, I’ve begun to reveal details concerning my labor- > > of-love New Constitution. Such has been inspired to correct our > > nation’s problems, and in ways that will be most advantageous to the > > American People. Incredibly, none of those things, or all three > > combined, rises to the threshold of being even “fifteen minutes” of… > > news, Because of our corrupt media, America is in big trouble—very big > > trouble! > > > Tim Russert, and his ilk, got or get, personal enjoyment from making > > others be uncomfortable, because of pointed questions or comments. A > > real gentleman wouldn’t do that. There was something in Russet’s > > ‘value system’ that just wasn’t right. That’s why I listed him, > > first, of those anti-democracy media figures who should face > > retribution for their crimes. It has been said that Russert had > > enthusiasm. But his enthusiasm was, quite simply, for doing the wrong > > things in his job; doing things not in the best interest of the > > country; and getting paid a huge salary to do so. Past ‘monetary > > compensation’ won’t stand anyone in good stead at the Pearly Gates. > > > George Carlin, bless his soul, had more vision for how America should > > be than any politician in Washington, or any media icon! The man > > perceived truths! Very few people can do that so insightfully, for so > > long, and with such fervor. His shoes will be very difficult ones to > > fill. > > > The ruinous media keeps right on doing their 24/7 “nothings” that they > > pass off as… news. Thinking Americans everywhere should wake up and > > realize how hugely biased the media is toward the status quo. If any > > of you are craving listening to talk, turn to the public radio and TV > > stations. To begin to save the last hope for America: democracy, by > > all means, STOP REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don’t give the > > ubiquitous media fools any ’scores’ to justify their commenting > > regarding politics, or anything else, as in Ballot Bowl or etc. > > Politics is NOT a game! > > > Hopefully, Barack Obama is the last of a long line of political two- > > faces. He has never reached a high enough moral plateau to qualify to > > be President. He didn’t treat Clinton with the respect that she > > deserved; and he didn’t honor simple principles of democracy regarding > > the FL and MI primaries. Those two things, and others, show that > > Obama is unprincipled. He likes anything—corrupt or not—that improves > > his chances of winning. People who think like that are the exact ones > > my New Constitution will send packing. The main ‘changes’ that the > > USA needs are as simple as straightening out the ‘quality of the > > personnel’ that we hire to work for us in Washington, and in our local > > and state governments. > > > Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!” > > Pass it on! > > > Respectfully submitted, > > > — NoEinstein — (AKA John A. Armistead) > > > On Jan 28, 2:01 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Folks: The details concerning my "briefs" to Chief Justice John > > > G. Roberts, Jr. about the disqualifying aspects of having Barack Obama > > > become President, are included in numbers of essays that I wrote > > > leading up to the 2008 Election. In looking back at those, most > > > continue to be quite apt as we consider how best to save the USA. > > > Here is one those, I think, interesting essays: > > > > 9/04/08 > > > > MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA! > > > > If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited > > > last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this > > > country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn’t signify that there is > > > less POWER in “the weaker sex”, it just differentiates the Hockey Moms > > > from the Pit Bulls! > > > > At last week’s Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked > > > the throng, “Are you ready to take back this country?” That question > > > seemed to imply that Obama’s motive for ‘change’ is to wrest the > > > control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and > > > return control to > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
