Dear Studio: Having a 'cashless' society should cut way down on crime. But there needs to be a trustworthy government in place that won't screw with individual rights. The technology of your favorite TV show, Star Trek, is in the realm of inventions. I'm an inventor who is having to "waste" his time trying to promote my common sense New Constitution. People like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh like to complain about the problems so long as no one does anything about the problems. Fox News, as presently constituted, is wishing to give "both sides" supposedly fair and balanced coverage. But they do that, not to help the country, but to foment the grand divisiveness that is so destroying America. Be it known: "Socialism is the ANTI-THESIS of democracies and republics, like the USA was patterned after." You don't invite those wishing to destroy the country onto national television, and allow those people to propose things that are hurtful to the USA. If Brit Hume is the person mainly responsible for doing that, then Brit Hume is guilty of TREASON! Here is what my New Constitution says:
"1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment— being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the free consent of the apt parties." — John A. Armistead — Patriot > On Jan 31, 5:24 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 1:06 am, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's kinda' like Star Trek, where they never show you how the bathroom > > operates because they can't envision how it could. > > Might they just beam the poop out of you and turn it into food with > > the replicator? > > Might you be able to beam poop into someones mouth that annoys you? > > Might someone who annoys you be beamed into space, or simply scrambled > > into atoms at the touch of a button form thousands of miles away? > > > Funny how the greatest weapon on Star Trek is not a weapon at all. > > > Yeah, the Constitution will guide you through that! > > And while I'm on the topic of Star Trek... > > Also notice how they don't use money anymore. > It's not based on capitalism as we know it, though the "money" is only > referred to as "credits". > This also is not explained in detail, the only thing they know is, > there won't be money or capitalism as we know it... because it's not > adequate for a future civilization. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
