Gays are NOT second class citizens.
---
but they are a protected group
thus, unequal

On Feb 3, 6:50 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
> No. Seperate is unequal.
>
> Gays are NOT second class citizens.
>
> On 2/3/11, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tommy,
>
> > Aside from the "well if they're the same..." argument -- if a civil
> > union had exactly the same legal rights as a marriage, would that be
> > acceptable to you?
>
> > On Feb 2, 8:43 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Newt Bedhopper Frogrich is a Homophobic Adulterous Hypocrite!
>
> >> Let’s Tear Apart Newt Gingrich’s Gay Marriage Logic!
>
> >> 2/2/11 at 12:50 PM Comment 26Comment 26Comments
> >> In some ways, the debate hosted by George Washington University last
> >> night between Howard Dean and Newt Gingrich was the first of the
> >> presidential campaign season, at least for Gingrich. Based on his
> >> performance, he'll be a formidable debate opponent for his fellow
> >> Republicans and, who knows, maybe President Obama. The former House
> >> Speaker demonstrated his ability to speak easily and at length on what
> >> will be the most prominent issues of the campaign, like the economy,
> >> national security, health-care reform, and immigration. He also
> >> briefly shared his thoughts on gay marriage:
>
> >> So Gingrich's argument is that:
> >> 1. He believes that marriage should be only between a man and a woman.
> >> 2. The GWU student believes that marriage should be between anyone who
> >> wants to get married.
> >> 3. Both have an equal right to their own beliefs.
> >> 4. Gay people can't get married.
>
> >> Something weird happened there between 3 and 4. The logical solution
> >> would be that gay people can get gay married, Newt Gingrich can get
> >> straight married, and nobody has to force their own personal beliefs
> >> on the other. But Gingrich doesn't come to that conclusion for some
> >> reason. Admittedly, neither does about half the country, and
> >> Gingrich's position is widely accepted, especially among Republican
> >> primary voters, the first group he has to impress.
>
> >> But here's a prediction: Gay marriage may not be a hugely important
> >> issue in the election, but because President Obama seems destined to
> >> announce his embrace of gay marriage in the not-too-distant future, it
> >> will be an issue. And you just know how Obama is going explain his
> >> change of heart, whenever he's asked about it, in debates and town
> >> halls and TV interviews — with stirring language about upholding core
> >> American ideals like equality, individual freedom, and loving thy
> >> neighbor. Maybe our liberal New Yorker mindset is tainting our
> >> thinking, but it's not hard to imagine Obama's conversion pushing a
> >> populace already rapidly warming to the idea of gay marriage further
> >> in that direction, to the point that a clear, reliable majority of the
> >> country finds the arguments of Gingrich (and the rest of the
> >> Republican field) as hollow and unconvincing as they truly are. At the
> >> very least, Gingrich may want to start thinking about how to deliver
> >> these unconvincing arguments without a sneer.
>
> >> More:http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/02/lets_tear_apart_newt_gingrichs.html
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to