Dear J. A.: Thanks! My New Constitution has the best interests of everyone at heart. MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of even a word of it. — NE — > On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat. > > On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > with > > your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > >> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed and > >> we might get somewhere? > >> Regard$, > >> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > >> about anything, without having to bother to deal > >> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On > >> Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with > >> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > >> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > >> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > >> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > >> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > >> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > >>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or > >>> attempt to) your efforts or claims. > >>> Regard$, > >>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > >>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > >>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > >>> the loss of their pleasing vision. > >>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM > >>> 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, > >>> aren't on a par with > >>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > >>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > >>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > >>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm > >>>> doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not > >>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation amuses > >>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to > >>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US > >>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something > >>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had. > >>>> Post the text already. > >>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable. > >>>> Regard$, > >>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is > >>>> no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong > >>>> probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken > >>> -- > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > >> -- > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges > and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
