On Feb 16, 8:46 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > <sigh> > I made no claim nor expressed any desire to be a 'co-author'. Yet MORE > fallacy. > This is getting rather sad, really. > Then, take you "quotations" elsewhere. Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. — > > Regard$, > --MJ
At 10:54 PM 2/15/2011, you wrote:Dear J. A.: Thanks! My New Constitution has the best interests of > everyone at heart. MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of > even a word of it. — NE — > > > On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat. > > > > On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > > with > > > your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > > when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > > must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > > ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > > >> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed > > >> and we might get somewhere? > > >> Regard$, > > >> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > > >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > > >> about anything, without having to bother to deal > > >> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On > > >> Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with > > >> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > >> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > >> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > >> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > >> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > >> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > > >>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or > > >>> attempt to) your efforts or claims. > > >>> Regard$, > > >>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > > >>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > > >>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > > >>> the loss of their pleasing vision. > > >>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM > > >>> 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, > > >>> aren't on a par with > > >>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > >>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > >>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > >>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm > > >>>> doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not > > >>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation amuses > > >>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to > > >>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US > > >>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something > > >>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had. > > >>>> Post the text already. > > >>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable. > > >>>> Regard$, > > >>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is > > >>>> no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong > > >>>> probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken > > >>> -- > > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >> -- > > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > -- > > Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges > > and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself! > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
