Dear Jonathan A. (airhead): At least 40% of my New Constitution has been copied and pasted numbers of times. The many readers of my posts surely know that it is very real. I don't care in the least what you nor MJ think about my Patriotic Efforts for the good of the country. For all I know, you two are communist operatives organizing opposition to the constitution that will put an end to your ilk. Save the readers and Google time and money: Simply go away from my posts. You are no longer welcome, here. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > On Feb 17, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > The more I watch this thread between John (NoEinstein) and Michael (MJ) > the more convinced I am that John has no New Constitution. If he does, > it will never be implemented because no one will ever see it. > > On 2/17/2011 7:53 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 8:46 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >> <sigh> > >> I made no claim nor expressed any desire to be a 'co-author'. Yet MORE > >> fallacy. > >> This is getting rather sad, really. > > > Then, take you "quotations" elsewhere. Ha, ha, HA! � J. A. A. � > >> Regard$, > >> --MJ > > At 10:54 PM 2/15/2011, you wrote:Dear J. A.: Thanks! My New > > Constitution has the best interests of > >> everyone at heart. MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of > >> even a word of it. � NE � > >> On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat. > > >>> On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > >>>> with > >>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > >>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > >>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > >>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > >>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > >>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>> On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > >>>>> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed > >>>>> and we might get somewhere? > >>>>> Regard$, > >>>>> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > >>>>> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > >>>>> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > >>>>> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > >>>>> about anything, without having to bother to deal > >>>>> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you > >>>>> wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with > >>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > >>>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > >>>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > >>>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > >>>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > >>>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > >>>>>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or > >>>>>> attempt to) your efforts or claims. > >>>>>> Regard$, > >>>>>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > >>>>>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > >>>>>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > >>>>>> the loss of their pleasing vision. > >>>>>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM > >>>>>> 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, > >>>>>> aren't on a par with > >>>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > >>>>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > >>>>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > >>>>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > >>>>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > >>>>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm > >>>>>>> doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not > >>>>>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation amuses > >>>>>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to > >>>>>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US > >>>>>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something > >>>>>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had. > >>>>>>> Post the text already. > >>>>>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable. > >>>>>>> Regard$, > >>>>>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world > >>>>>>> is no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong > >>>>>>> probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >>>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > >>> -- > >>> Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges > >>> and lawyers<http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself! > >> -- > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges > and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
