Jonathan, since you have not said one thing positive about my efforts, that identifies you as a socialist-communist. Bug-off, loser! — J. A. A. — > On Feb 25, 11:55 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears to me you are about self-glorification, not patriotism. > > On 2/25/2011 7:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Socialist-Communist: There is three or four times more MEAT in > > the 40% of my New Constitution, regularly printed in the thread, than > > in the entire original Constitution! In the RUDEST way, you've > > attacked me for not showing you the 60%, when you haven't cared enough > > to even look back for the meaty 40%! Make your own post, traitor. > > I'm about saving the USA. I have a �pointed wooden stake� for the > > heart of anyone who stands in my way! � J. A. A. � Patriot > > On Feb 23, 11:21 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> John, > > >> I was under the impression when I joined this political "discussion" > >> group that folks subscribed to the group to discuss political issues. > > >> Your failure to post YOUR New Constitution when at least four people > >> (including myself) have expressed a sincere interest in reading it shows > >> you are not interested in having it enacted. Either that or you are > >> afraid of the feedback you will receive. > > >> I seem to recall your concern with publishing it was it isn't > >> copyrighted. Would a true "patriot" (as you continually label yourself) > >> be more concerned with the direction in which his country is headed or > >> HIS copyright protection? As it stands now, YOUR New Constitution will > >> likely die when you do because no one else will ever have a chance to > >> read it. > > >> Your claim that I am "likely socialist-communist" shows you have never > >> read anything I have posted to this group. If you had you would know > >> that I come real close to believing that the government that governs > >> best is no government at all. A completely voluntary society could not > >> possibly be any worse than the socialist police state we now live in. > > >> Your comment, "You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA!" > >> only confirms my suspicion that you are a wanna-be dictator. If you were > >> a moderator for this group, I would likely have been banned long ago > >> because I dared to comment on YOUR posts. > > >> On 2/23/2011 6:33 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>> Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on > >>> MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist- > >>> communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! � > >>> John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>> On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is ever > >>>> allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making. > >>>> On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > >>>>> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone > >>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > >>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with > >>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > >>>>> have > >>>>> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick > >>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the > >>>>> President > >>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of > >>>>> a > >>>>> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit: > >>>>> Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your > >>>>> throats. > >>>>> On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New > >>>>>> Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of it > >>>>>> not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document. > >>>>>> This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but to > >>>>>> be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously, > >>>>>> make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to side-track > >>>>>> my efforts. > >>>>>> I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for fourteen > >>>>>> years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises highlighted > >>>>>> in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. What > >>>>>> is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the original > >>>>>> constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the > >>>>>> Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with our > >>>>>> Constitution. > >>>>>> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone > >>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > >>>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with > >>>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could have > >>>>>> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick > >>>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the President > >>>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of a > >>>>>> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit: > >>>>>> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of > >>>>>> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > >>>>>> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall > >>>>>> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > >>>>>> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or > >>>>>> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and the > >>>>>> right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its > >>>>>> branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so > >>>>>> petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, > >>>>>> comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who > >>>>>> have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of > >>>>>> the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure > >>>>>> to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, > >>>>>> on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s employment, > >>>>>> especially those in management or public office�including judges and > >>>>>> justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any > >>>>>> competent > >>>>>> Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly > >>>>>> addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No > >>>>>> judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required > >>>>>> duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity > >>>>>> or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well informed. > >>>>>> Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable > >>>>>> truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or > >>>>>> deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious fiction > >>>>>> or > >>>>>> satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news > >>>>>> medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is > >>>>>> prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly > >>>>>> occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or > >>>>>> ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as > >>>>>> being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in > >>>>>> any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments > >>>>>> occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would > >>>>>> come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are > >>>>>> innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of > >>>>>> its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such > >>>>>> job to hawk their personal political preferences�at risk of loss of > >>>>>> license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to > >>>>>> promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall > >>>>>> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any > >>>>>> pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside > >>>>>> of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the > >>>>>> candidates or referenda issues�on an as occurs basis�is allowed, > >>>>>> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided > >>>>>> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all > >>>>>> of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress > >>>>>> truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No > >>>>>> medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by > >>>>>> others, but if a person is harmed by the medium�s content, they shall > >>>>>> be allowed to reply�without editing�in that medium. Each medium > >>>>>> shall > >>>>>> respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other > >>>>>> medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall > >>>>>> not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on > >>>>>> government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment� > >>>>>> being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing > >>>>>> thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the > >>>>>> truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive > >>>>>> commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any > >>>>>> candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive > >>>>>> campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
