Jonathan, the socialist-communist, is undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Feb 28, 11:49 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > Once again, "Nanci Pelosi, Harry Reid and their ilk" will never be > hanged for treason. Why? Because YOUR New Constitution will never be > read let alone enacted by the 50 States. > > On 2/28/2011 7:09 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Anointed One: You aren't very well informed. Nancy Pelosi, > > Harry Reid and their ilk will all be hanged for TREASON for trying to > > turn the USA into a socialist Nation. Read the 40% of my New > > Constitution in the thread, and you will see that I empower the > > PEOPLE, not me. Everyone in the USA will benefit, whether they > > realize it or not. Having a small, efficient, and deferential > > government, and a prosperous free enterprise system is the "Shortest > > Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." (That�s the name of my book at > > Amazon and B.& N.) Check it out! � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > On Feb 26, 2:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >> since you try to berate me by comparing me to "bad people", > > >> I did not do that.... your own words and attitudes reflected in them > >> mirror Pelosi to a "T". > > >> On Feb 26, 5:57 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Mark, since you have not said one thing positive about my efforts; and > >>> since you try to berate me by comparing me to "bad people", that > >>> identifies you as a socialist-communist. Bug-off, loser! � J. A. A. > >>> � > >>> On Feb 25, 11:27 am, Mark<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> <<<<Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be > >>>> the latter.>>> > >>>> Funny, hitler and Qadaffi said the same thing. Fine company there. > >>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, > >>>> NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>> Dear MJ: You sir, are a total BUM! What I have written describing my > >>>>> New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would > >>>>> fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I > >>>>> have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of > >>>>> having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to > >>>>> zero interaction with individual citizens. �My� government will no > >>>>> longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be > >>>>> value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain > >>>>> records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent. > >>>>> Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict" > >>>>> the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of > >>>>> corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification > >>>>> enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police > >>>>> state�with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And > >>>>> the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I�ve put > >>>>> them in their place, big time! > >>>>> You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in > >>>>> the least having you post your elementary version of "A" constitution > >>>>> of some kind. Post your God-damned junk constitution under your name, > >>>>> not mine. I am not playing games, here. If you would like to get > >>>>> back into anyone's good graces, explain your political philosophy in > >>>>> two paragraphs or less. Unless I see the words: �I pro-capitalist > >>>>> and anti-socialist�� included, then I will know for sure that you > >>>>> are > >>>>> just some HACKER who is back-dooring your socialist-communist ideals. > >>>>> Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be > >>>>> the latter. � J. A. A. � > >>>>> On Feb 23, 9:40 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> In case anyone missed it ... anyone who ASKS to > >>>>>> see this 'Constitution' ... is labelled as a socialist-communist. > >>>>>> My guess is that this Constitution upholds, > >>>>>> endorses and hails ... socialism. THAT is the > >>>>>> true reason Armistead does not want to post it OR let anyone 'see it'. > >>>>>> Pity. > >>>>>> Regard$, > >>>>>> --MJ > >>>>>> "We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the > >>>>>> consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum > >>>>>> At 09:33 PM 2/23/2011, you wrote: > >>>>>>> Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on > >>>>>>> MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist- > >>>>>>> communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! > >>>>>>> � > >>>>>>> John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is > >>>>> ever > >>>>>>>> allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making. > >>>>>>>> On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > >>>>>>>>> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>>>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor > >>>>> anyone > >>>>>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about > >>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins > >>>>> with > >>>>>>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>>>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > >>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick > >>>>>>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the > >>>>>>>>> President > >>>>>>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To > >>>>> wit: > >>>>>>>>> Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your > >>>>>>>>> throats. > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New > >>>>>>>>>> Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of > >>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>> not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document. > >>>>>>>>>> This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, > >>>>> but to > >>>>>>>>>> be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, > >>>>> maliciously, > >>>>>>>>>> make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to > >>>>> side-track > >>>>>>>>>> my efforts. > >>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for > >>>>> fourteen > >>>>>>>>>> years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises > >>>>> highlighted > >>>>>>>>>> in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. > >>>>> What > >>>>>>>>>> is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the > >>>>> original > >>>>>>>>>> constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the > >>>>>>>>>> Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with > >>>>> our > >>>>>>>>>> Constitution. > >>>>>>>>>> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>>>>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor > >>>>> anyone > >>>>>>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about > >>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins > >>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>>>>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > >>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or > >>>>> kick > >>>>>>>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the > >>>>> President > >>>>>>>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request > >>>>> of a > >>>>>>>>>> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To > >>>>> wit: > >>>>>>>>>> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > >>>>>>>>>> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements > >>>>> shall > >>>>>>>>>> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > >>>>>>>>>> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press > >>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its > >>>>>>>>>> branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so > >>>>>>>>>> petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, > >>>>> timely, > >>>>>>>>>> comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities > >>>>> who > >>>>>>>>>> have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient > >>>>> aspect of > >>>>>>>>>> the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. > >>>>> Failure > >>>>>>>>>> to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance > >>>>> shall, > >>>>>>>>>> on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s > >>>>> employment, > >>>>>>>>>> especially those in management or public office�including judges > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any > >>>>> competent > >>>>>>>>>> Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly > >>>>>>>>>> addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No > >>>>>>>>>> judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above > >>>>> required > >>>>>>>>>> duties, that they in any way might be compromising their > >>>>> objectivity > >>>>>>>>>> or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well > >>>>> informed. > >>>>>>>>>> Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be > >>>>> reasonable > >>>>>>>>>> truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or > >>>>>>>>>> deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious > >>>>> fiction or > >>>>>>>>>> satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular > >>>>> news > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
