My dearest Einstein.... it is misspelt on purpose... I am certainly NOT Anointed...
Since you would like to be correct in all things... THIS IS AN INTERNET FORUM Definition is: An *Internet forum*, or *message board*, is an online discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages. What you are looking for is a self-serving BLOG as all members on a forum do have the right to respond to ANYTHING as they see fit in civil tone. As to what you have done.... about twenty years to write a set of (your description) unfinished rules in the form of a constitution that you do want everyone to praise but don't want anyone to read or comment on... how Pelosi of you. There are reasons that documents such as you are trying to produce are done by committee,at least with intelligent and educated people involved they are. There are reasons that every draft is sent to several people for input and polishing... If those reasons escape you or you are not willing for whatever reason then it will die with you. On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:41 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Anointed One: You can't even spell your own handle. I'm posting > NOT to get anyone's feed-back, but simply to inform people what I've > done. Frankly, I have better things to do than to banter with > shallows like you. — J. A. A. — > > > On Feb 23, 10:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your response to people is: <<<< I am NOT wishing to have your nor > > anyone > > else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > > entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > > or that>>> > > > > How VERY Nancy Pelosi of you. > > > > On Feb 23, 8:42 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Anointed One: If you agree with the mega pages I've written > > > explaining my New Constitution, I welcome you support. But when you > > > simply copy what I wrote, and substitute your own pet ideas, I'm not > > > sure if you are for a better and tougher constitution or not. > > > Concisely stated replies will be appreciated. — John A. Armistead — > > > Patriot > > > > > On Feb 23, 2:45 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > "That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > > > > scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone > > > > else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > > > > entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > > > > or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with > > > > our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > > > > speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > > > > have had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or > kick > > > > out of office any public official or employee, including the > President > > > > himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of > > > > a single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance." > > > > > > (The Anointed One wrote:) Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the > DEMS slammed down your throats. > > > > > > On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New > > > > > Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of > it > > > > > not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document. > > > > > This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but > to > > > > > be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously, > > > > > make me look bad—as part of a socialist/communist plot to > side-track > > > > > my efforts. > > > > > > > I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for > fourteen > > > > > years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises > highlighted > > > > > in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. > What > > > > > is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the > original > > > > > constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the > > > > > Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with > our > > > > > Constitution. > > > > > > > That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > > > > > scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor > anyone > > > > > else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > > > > > entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about > this > > > > > or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins > with > > > > > our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > > > > > speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > have > > > > > had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick > > > > > out of office any public official or employee, including the > President > > > > > himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request > of a > > > > > single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To > wit: > > > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment > of > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements > shall > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > > > > > freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or > > > > > other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and > the > > > > > right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its > > > > > branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so > > > > > petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, > > > > > comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities > who > > > > > have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect > of > > > > > the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. > Failure > > > > > to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance > shall, > > > > > on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, > > > > > especially those in management or public office—including judges > and > > > > > justices—who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any > competent > > > > > Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly > > > > > addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No > > > > > judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above > required > > > > > duties, that they in any way might be compromising their > objectivity > > > > > or fairness in court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. > > > > > Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be > reasonable > > > > > truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or > > > > > deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction > or > > > > > satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news > > > > > medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is > > > > > prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly > > > > > occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, > or > > > > > ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named > as > > > > > being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are > in > > > > > any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments > > > > > occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would > > > > > come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such > are > > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology > of > > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses > such > > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of > > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to > > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall > > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any > > > > > pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others > outside > > > > > of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the > > > > > candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed, > > > > > provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided > > > > > the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to > all > > > > > of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress > > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. > No > > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by > > > > > others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they > shall > > > > > be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium > shall > > > > > respond to breaking news without considering the response of any > other > > > > > medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage > shall > > > > > not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on > > > > > government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with > detachment— > > > > > being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing > > > > > thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the > > > > > truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or > deceptive > > > > > commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any > > > > > candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or > deceptive > > > > > campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a > > > > > felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special > > > > > interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates > for > > > > > public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall > > > > > display active public records without the free consent of the apt > > > > > parties." > > > > > > > Keith, the above should highlight the extreme attention to detail > I've > > > > > put into my document. No person, by a casual comment, shall have > the > > > > > "right" to denigrate my efforts. The following proviso is at the > > > > > closing of my New Constitution: > > > > > > > "Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New > > > > > Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and > specifically > > > > > approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New > Constitution > > > > > shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group > or > > > > > business which polls the People on their support or non support of > > > > > this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national > referendum, > > > > > shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news > media > > > > > standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this > > > > > document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by > the > > > > > People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person > therein— > > > > > including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance > > > > > with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter > to > > > > > this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of > > > > > the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The > macro- > > > > > will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!" > > > > > > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 12:54 pm, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Good Afternoon John, > > > > > > > > Like Jonathan, Michael, and Mark, I too would like to see your > New > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * *The cost of living hasn't affected its popularity.* -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
