John,
I'm so glad you told us that you're "the smartest man around." I would
not have guessed so otherwise.
On 2/28/2011 6:59 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Anointed one: Do this: Form the best committee you can and
write us a better constitution. After several years of effort, you'll
realize that it would have been better to let the smartest man around
(me) do the writing. That benefits everyone except those who wish to
have their fingers in every pie. But be it known: "Those without
ability should never be allowed in the kitchen!" — J. A. A. —
On Feb 26, 2:01 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
"A 'camel' is a horse designed in a
committee."
Yes indeed it is (in your mind). A camel is so well suited for its use
where it exists that only fools own horses there. A horse is not
capable of doing a camels work... and with the exception of speed
(both in km/h and to the grave)... the inverse is not true.... try
again.
On Feb 26, 5:54 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Mark, one of the airheads: "A 'camel' is a horse designed in a
committee." I happen to be among the most intelligent people ever
born on this Earth. I could have gone into... politics (God forbid!)
and had my talents negated in committees and in the daily empty
RITUAL. I had seen how departed from the Constitution our government
had become, and decided that the only solution would be to make our
constitution STRONGER. Along the way, I realized that too many really
important things were being left for being defined in subsequent
laws. So, I gradually added-in items that most Americans will
recognize as affecting their daily lives. Having those things be
visible in the New Constitution, itself, will have government working
quite well without "trusting" that the House (There will be no
senate.) can write some good laws. The best way to assure that only
good laws, acceptable to the majority of Americans, will be passed, is
my having raised the minimum vote for passage to 60%. (Note: 55% is
probationary, only.) I've also denied the media access to the
capital. That will remove most of the ego component from those
wishing to be "important", because they are in the public eye all the
time. I require that House members never have held public office nor
been employed by government (other than for possible military
service). So, there will be no more... "career" politicians! And I
limit the total number of... lawyers in public office to 20%,
maximum. Restrictions on lawyers in businesses, also, is crucial to
improving the working climate in this country, so no business will
ever try to take unfair advantage of their employees nor their
customers. Read back into my thread. I really don't have time to
keep "capsuling" my document—which has been developed over a 14-year
period to benefit the majority of Americans. — John A. Armistead —
Patriot
On Feb 25, 11:24 am, Mark<[email protected]> wrote:
My dearest Einstein.... it is misspelt on purpose... I am certainly NOT
Anointed...
Since you would like to be correct in all things... THIS IS AN INTERNET
FORUM
Definition is: An *Internet forum*, or *message board*, is an online
discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted
messages.
What you are looking for is a self-serving BLOG as all members on a forum do
have the right to respond to ANYTHING as they see fit in civil tone.
As to what you have done.... about twenty years to write a set of (your
description) unfinished rules in the form of a constitution that you do want
everyone to praise but don't want anyone to read or comment on... how Pelosi
of you.
There are reasons that documents such as you are trying to produce are done
by committee,at least with intelligent and educated people involved they
are. There are reasons that every draft is sent to several people for input
and polishing...
If those reasons escape you or you are not willing for whatever reason then
it will die with you.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:41 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:
Dear Anointed One: You can't even spell your own handle. I'm posting
NOT to get anyone's feed-back, but simply to inform people what I've
done. Frankly, I have better things to do than to banter with
shallows like you. — J. A. A. —
On Feb 23, 10:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
Your response to people is:<<<< I am NOT wishing to have your nor
anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this
or that>>>
How VERY Nancy Pelosi of you.
On Feb 23, 8:42 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Anointed One: If you agree with the mega pages I've written
explaining my New Constitution, I welcome you support. But when you
simply copy what I wrote, and substitute your own pet ideas, I'm not
sure if you are for a better and tougher constitution or not.
Concisely stated replies will be appreciated. — John A. Armistead —
Patriot
On Feb 23, 2:45 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
"That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this
or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with
our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
have had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or
kick
out of office any public official or employee, including the
President
himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of
a single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance."
(The Anointed One wrote:) Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the
DEMS slammed down your throats.
On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New
Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of
it
not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document.
This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but
to
be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously,
make me look bad—as part of a socialist/communist plot to
side-track
my efforts.
I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for
fourteen
years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises
highlighted
in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts.
What
is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the
original
constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the
Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with
our
Constitution.
That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about
this
or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins
with
our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
have
had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick
out of office any public official or employee, including the
President
himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request
of a
single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To
wit:
"1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment
of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements
shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or
other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and
the
right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its
branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so
petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely,
comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities
who
have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect
of
the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications.
Failure
to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance
shall,
on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment,
especially those in management or public office—including judges
and
justices—who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any
competent
Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly
addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No
judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above
required
duties, that they in any way might be compromising their
objectivity
or fairness in court; justice be not
...
read more »
--
*"Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft"
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>*
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
