Jonathan, the socialist-communist, is undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Feb 28, 11:46 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > I'm so glad you told us that you're "the smartest man around." I would > not have guessed so otherwise. > > On 2/28/2011 6:59 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Anointed one: Do this: Form the best committee you can and > > write us a better constitution. After several years of effort, you'll > > realize that it would have been better to let the smartest man around > > (me) do the writing. That benefits everyone except those who wish to > > have their fingers in every pie. But be it known: "Those without > > ability should never be allowed in the kitchen!" � J. A. A. � > > On Feb 26, 2:01 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >> "A 'camel' is a horse designed in a > >> committee." > > >> Yes indeed it is (in your mind). A camel is so well suited for its use > >> where it exists that only fools own horses there. A horse is not > >> capable of doing a camels work... and with the exception of speed > >> (both in km/h and to the grave)... the inverse is not true.... try > >> again. > > >> On Feb 26, 5:54 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Dear Mark, one of the airheads: "A 'camel' is a horse designed in a > >>> committee." I happen to be among the most intelligent people ever > >>> born on this Earth. I could have gone into... politics (God forbid!) > >>> and had my talents negated in committees and in the daily empty > >>> RITUAL. I had seen how departed from the Constitution our government > >>> had become, and decided that the only solution would be to make our > >>> constitution STRONGER. Along the way, I realized that too many really > >>> important things were being left for being defined in subsequent > >>> laws. So, I gradually added-in items that most Americans will > >>> recognize as affecting their daily lives. Having those things be > >>> visible in the New Constitution, itself, will have government working > >>> quite well without "trusting" that the House (There will be no > >>> senate.) can write some good laws. The best way to assure that only > >>> good laws, acceptable to the majority of Americans, will be passed, is > >>> my having raised the minimum vote for passage to 60%. (Note: 55% is > >>> probationary, only.) I've also denied the media access to the > >>> capital. That will remove most of the ego component from those > >>> wishing to be "important", because they are in the public eye all the > >>> time. I require that House members never have held public office nor > >>> been employed by government (other than for possible military > >>> service). So, there will be no more... "career" politicians! And I > >>> limit the total number of... lawyers in public office to 20%, > >>> maximum. Restrictions on lawyers in businesses, also, is crucial to > >>> improving the working climate in this country, so no business will > >>> ever try to take unfair advantage of their employees nor their > >>> customers. Read back into my thread. I really don't have time to > >>> keep "capsuling" my document�which has been developed over a 14-year > >>> period to benefit the majority of Americans. � John A. Armistead � > >>> Patriot > >>> On Feb 25, 11:24 am, Mark<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> My dearest Einstein.... it is misspelt on purpose... I am certainly NOT > >>>> Anointed... > >>>> Since you would like to be correct in all things... THIS IS AN INTERNET > >>>> FORUM > >>>> Definition is: An *Internet forum*, or *message board*, is an online > >>>> discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted > >>>> messages. > >>>> What you are looking for is a self-serving BLOG as all members on a > >>>> forum do > >>>> have the right to respond to ANYTHING as they see fit in civil tone. > >>>> As to what you have done.... about twenty years to write a set of (your > >>>> description) unfinished rules in the form of a constitution that you do > >>>> want > >>>> everyone to praise but don't want anyone to read or comment on... how > >>>> Pelosi > >>>> of you. > >>>> There are reasons that documents such as you are trying to produce are > >>>> done > >>>> by committee,at least with intelligent and educated people involved they > >>>> are. There are reasons that every draft is sent to several people for > >>>> input > >>>> and polishing... > >>>> If those reasons escape you or you are not willing for whatever reason > >>>> then > >>>> it will die with you. > >>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:41 AM, > >>>> NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>> Dear Anointed One: You can't even spell your own handle. I'm posting > >>>>> NOT to get anyone's feed-back, but simply to inform people what I've > >>>>> done. Frankly, I have better things to do than to banter with > >>>>> shallows like you. � J. A. A. � > >>>>> On Feb 23, 10:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Your response to people is:<<<< I am NOT wishing to have your nor > >>>>>> anyone > >>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > >>>>>> or that>>> > >>>>>> How VERY Nancy Pelosi of you. > >>>>>> On Feb 23, 8:42 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> Dear Anointed One: If you agree with the mega pages I've written > >>>>>>> explaining my New Constitution, I welcome you support. But when you > >>>>>>> simply copy what I wrote, and substitute your own pet ideas, I'm not > >>>>>>> sure if you are for a better and tougher constitution or not. > >>>>>>> Concisely stated replies will be appreciated. � John A. Armistead > >>>>>>> � > >>>>>>> Patriot > >>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2:45 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> "That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone > >>>>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this > >>>>>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with > >>>>>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > >>>>>>>> have had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or > >>>>> kick > >>>>>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the > >>>>> President > >>>>>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of > >>>>>>>> a single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance." > >>>>>>>> (The Anointed One wrote:) Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the > >>>>> DEMS slammed down your throats. > >>>>>>>> On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New > >>>>>>>>> Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of > >>>>> it > >>>>>>>>> not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document. > >>>>>>>>> This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously, > >>>>>>>>> make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to > >>>>> side-track > >>>>>>>>> my efforts. > >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for > >>>>> fourteen > >>>>>>>>> years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises > >>>>> highlighted > >>>>>>>>> in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. > >>>>> What > >>>>>>>>> is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the > >>>>> original > >>>>>>>>> constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the > >>>>>>>>> Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with > >>>>> our > >>>>>>>>> Constitution. > >>>>>>>>> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has > >>>>>>>>> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor > >>>>> anyone > >>>>>>>>> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the > >>>>>>>>> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about > >>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins > >>>>> with > >>>>>>>>> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to > >>>>>>>>> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could > >>>>> have > >>>>>>>>> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick > >>>>>>>>> out of office any public official or employee, including the > >>>>> President > >>>>>>>>> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request > >>>>> of a > >>>>>>>>> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To > >>>>> wit: > >>>>>>>>> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > >>>>>>>>> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements > >>>>> shall > >>>>>>>>> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > >>>>>>>>> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or > >>>>>>>>> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its > >>>>>>>>> branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so > >>>>>>>>> petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, > >>>>>>>>> comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities > >>>>> who > >>>>>>>>> have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. > >>>>> Failure > >>>>>>>>> to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance > >>>>> shall, > >>>>>>>>> on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s employment, > >>>>>>>>> especially those in management or public office�including judges > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any > >>>>> competent > >>>>>>>>> Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly > >>>>>>>>> addressed, or in having > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
