John,
Once again, "Nanci Pelosi, Harry Reid and their ilk" will never be
hanged for treason. Why? Because YOUR New Constitution will never be
read let alone enacted by the 50 States.
On 2/28/2011 7:09 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Anointed One: You aren't very well informed. Nancy Pelosi,
Harry Reid and their ilk will all be hanged for TREASON for trying to
turn the USA into a socialist Nation. Read the 40% of my New
Constitution in the thread, and you will see that I empower the
PEOPLE, not me. Everyone in the USA will benefit, whether they
realize it or not. Having a small, efficient, and deferential
government, and a prosperous free enterprise system is the "Shortest
Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." (That’s the name of my book at
Amazon and B.& N.) Check it out! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
On Feb 26, 2:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
since you try to berate me by comparing me to "bad people",
I did not do that.... your own words and attitudes reflected in them
mirror Pelosi to a "T".
On Feb 26, 5:57 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Mark, since you have not said one thing positive about my efforts; and
since you try to berate me by comparing me to "bad people", that
identifies you as a socialist-communist. Bug-off, loser! — J. A. A.
—
On Feb 25, 11:27 am, Mark<[email protected]> wrote:
<<<<Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
the latter.>>>
Funny, hitler and Qadaffi said the same thing. Fine company there.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:
Dear MJ: You sir, are a total BUM! What I have written describing my
New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would
fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I
have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of
having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to
zero interaction with individual citizens. ‘My’ government will no
longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be
value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain
records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent.
Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict"
the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of
corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification
enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police
state—with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And
the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I’ve put
them in their place, big time!
You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in
the least having you post your elementary version of "A" constitution
of some kind. Post your God-damned junk constitution under your name,
not mine. I am not playing games, here. If you would like to get
back into anyone's good graces, explain your political philosophy in
two paragraphs or less. Unless I see the words: “I pro-capitalist
and anti-socialist”… included, then I will know for sure that you are
just some HACKER who is back-dooring your socialist-communist ideals.
Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
the latter. — J. A. A. —
On Feb 23, 9:40 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote:
In case anyone missed it ... anyone who ASKS to
see this 'Constitution' ... is labelled as a socialist-communist.
My guess is that this Constitution upholds,
endorses and hails ... socialism. THAT is the
true reason Armistead does not want to post it OR let anyone 'see it'.
Pity.
Regard$,
--MJ
"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
At 09:33 PM 2/23/2011, you wrote:
Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on
MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist-
communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! —
John A. Armistead — Patriot
On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]>
wrote:
How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is
ever
allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making.
On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about
this
or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins
with
our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
have
had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick
out of office any public official or employee, including the
President
himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request
of
a
single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To
wit:
Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your
throats.
On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New
Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of
it
not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document.
This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies,
but to
be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would,
maliciously,
make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to
side-track
my efforts.
I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for
fourteen
years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises
highlighted
in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts.
What
is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the
original
constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the
Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with
our
Constitution.
That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see
the
entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about
this
or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins
with
our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
have
had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or
kick
out of office any public official or employee, including the
President
himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request
of a
single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To
wit:
"1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment
of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements
shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press
or
other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and
the
right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its
branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so
petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant,
timely,
comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities
who
have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient
aspect of
the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications.
Failure
to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance
shall,
on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s
employment,
especially those in management or public office�including judges
and
justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any
competent
Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly
addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No
judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above
required
duties, that they in any way might be compromising their
objectivity
or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well
informed.
Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be
reasonable
truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or
deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious
fiction or
satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular
news
medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by,
or
ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named
as
being authored by management; editorial comments by others that
are
...
read more »
--
*"Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft"
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>*
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
