CORRECTION! What has actually transpired! — J. A. A. — > On Apr 8, 11:41 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan: Intelligence is only part of a solution. I am one in 300 > million, because I have keen powers of observation; common sense; an > incredible work ethic; understanding of human nature; and an unselfish > motivation to improve the USA and the world. Most people starting to > write a new constitution would tire of the task after a month. > Everything I have written was for solving specific problems > highlighted in the news. If the Founding Fathers could have had the > power of foresight comparable to my hindsight (learning from what has > actually transcribed) they would back my efforts 100%. Like I've > said: I've spent at least ten times the total man hours spent by > those who made known physical contributions to the wording of the > Constitution. PLUS! I have had the benefit of using my computers to > help refine and arrange the many parts. Show us how YOU string > sentences together to solve a problem. I'm not ashamed of any part of > what I've done. But I'd bet you aren't bold enough to try writing > even one paragraph to improve the world. — John A. Armistead — > Patriot > > On Apr 5, 3:17 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > John, > > > I am well aware of your previous claims as to why you ordered YOUR New > > Constitution as you did. I simply wanted to point out to those 300-plus > > million people who you deem to be less intellectual than yourself how > > ludicrous such a construction is. > > > On 04/05/2011 11:56 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Jonathan: I've answered that same question numbers of times. > > > Obviously, you've not read very far back in my thread. The logical > > > reason for the order of my New Constitution is because I used the > > > original constitution as the model. My first step was to transcribe > > > the Constitution into my computer. I did this in the days before > > > there was big cut and paste. Only by transcribing the Constitution, > > > one key stroke at a time, does one come to realize how crudely written > > > the Constitution actually is. Except for the (after-thought) Bill of > > > Rights, there is very little other than an organizational structure in > > > the majority of the Constitution. Wherever possible, I 'fluffed out' > > > the document in those locations where the "subject heading" was > > > there. That's why Article III is so much longer. Anyone wishing to > > > find out about the Judiciary can still locate that in Article III. > > > And anyone wishing to see if their rights are still there can look for > > > the clarified and expanded Bill of Rights and Amendments. I invite > > > the readers to look at what I've written one sentence at a time. The > > > citizens�as individuals, not as 'puppet' members of biased groups�will > > > have incredibly more power, and more civil liberties! When the size > > > of government goes DOWN, civil liberties go UP! � J. A. Armistead � > > > Patriot > > > On Apr 4, 1:30 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> John, > > > >> I have a simple question that even someone with your incredibly superior > > >> intelligence<g> should be able to answer. > > > >> How is it YOUR New Constitution has a "1st Amendment" when it has yet to > > >> be viewed in its entirety, let alone ratified? > > > >> On 04/04/2011 10:19 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > >>> Folks: A blushing, almost-kid-like Glenn Beck was on Bill O'Reilly's > > >>> TV program this week. It was discussed whether The Donald's ideas for > > >>> dealing with our economic woes make him a viable candidate for > > >>> President. O'Reilly said, "Yes." But Beck said he would prefer a > > >>> candidate who "just speaks the truth" (rather than one who has an > > >>> actual PLAN that works). As a regular laugher (mostly) at Glenn > > >>> Beck's e4 shows, his blackboards and shuffling of photos to > > >>> incriminate people have gotten old fast. His memorable shows are now > > >>> about one per month, where they used to be about one out of three. In > > >>> essence, he has run out of material. His having > > >>> �oh-isn't-that-sweat� > > >>> shows like Mike Huckabee isn't improving the chances the USA will > > >>> survive. Nor is Beck�s delusion that our present broke, broke > > >>> government can be fixed if only the voters can be told... "the > > >>> truth". Beck is going on faith that towns (like in Ohio) can be saved > > >>> and countries, too, if only the good people in his viewing audience > > >>> can get the word... > > >>> At Fox News only two people stand out as selling the conservative > > >>> route to salvation for the USA: Stu Varney and Andrew Napolitano. > > >>> Sean Hannity continues to shoot-himself-in-the-foot by having Bob > > >>> Beckel, the socialist, Obama-loving traitor as his regular guest. > > >>> "Bob is a good friend," Hannity says. Anyone having Beckel as a > > >>> friend isn't fit to have air time in this country. My New > > >>> Constitution says: > > >>> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of > > >>> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > > >>> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall > > >>> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > > >>> freedom of speech; ***the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or > > >>> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right > > >>> of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches > > >>> or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning > > >>> government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, > > >>> helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly > > >>> read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances > > >>> or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond > > >>> to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single > > >>> provable instance, terminate the apt one�s employment, especially > > >>> those in management or public office�including judges and > > >>> justices�who > > >>> ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who > > >>> has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in > > >>> having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice > > >>> shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they > > >>> in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in > > >>> court; justice be not �blind�, but well informed. Freedom of the > > >>> press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness > > >>> in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission > > >>> of the truth�except in cases of obvious fiction or satire�is > > >>> prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a > > >>> collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for > > >>> example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying > > >>> comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened > > >>> by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by > > >>> management; editorial comments by others that are in any way > > >>> ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring > > >>> at specific times or designated locations that most would come to > > >>> associate with the management of such medium, even if such are > > >>> innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of > > >>> its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such > > >>> job to hawk their personal political preferences�at risk of loss of > > >>> license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to > > >>> promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall > > >>> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any > > >>> pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside > > >>> of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the > > >>> candidates or referenda issues�on an as occurs basis�is allowed, > > >>> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided > > >>> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all > > >>> of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress > > >>> truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No > > >>> medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by > > >>> others, but if a person is harmed by the medium�s content, they shall > > >>> be allowed to reply�without editing�in that medium. Each medium > > >>> shall > > >>> respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other > > >>> medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall > > >>> not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on > > >>> government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment� > > >>> being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing > > >>> thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the > > >>> truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive > > >>> commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any > > >>> candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive > > >>> campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a > > >>> felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special > > >>> interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for > > >>> public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall > > >>> display active public records without the free consent of the apt > > >>> parties." > > >>> "The freedom of a fair and pro democracy press..." means that NO > > >>> person hired by the media�as consultants, commentators or otherwise� > > >>> shall be allowed air time or > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
