It seems to me that John A. Armistead — Patriot — has wasted a lot of
time. Not only will he not post his alleged masterpiece (which he claims
has taken him 14 years to complete), he has allowed the current
government many, many years to further decompose.
Since he claims to have all the answers, why has he not enticed the
masses to accept his solutions?
On 03/04/2011 10:14 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Sage 2: Apparently, you can't understand the difference between
assessing the problems with our government and FIXING the problems.
Like I've told you, the Constitution was too "trusting" that quality
people would get elected to office. The Founding Fathers had no way
of realizing the negative effects of having the elitist media treat
elected officials like ROYALTY. The ego maniacal, career politicians
we now have in Washington (mostly lawyers) desired supposed public
service to make them feel more important. The effect of that is to
have only ego maniacs willing to vie for public service. But I want
salt-of-the-Earth types to represent us! So, I take the media out of
the equation and limit our representatives to those who have NEVER
held public office before.
Please realize that I don't have the time nor the motivation to keep
justifying my spending fourteen years writing my New Constitution,
only to have a "shallow" like you claim that no changes are needed.
My guess is that you are hoping in your heart that I don't get to FIX
the problems, because you like the unfair inequities in this country
just as they are. If you can’t change your thinking relative to my
efforts, this will be the last time I ever reply to you. — John A.
Armistead — Patriot
On Mar 2, 11:26 pm, Sage2<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Keith,Mark and John
The weakness is not in the Constitution but in the fact that
we have moved away from it's original intent. To make a long history
short we have become a two party oligarchy whereby the politicians
represent themselves their "shadows" and their " phantoms"; not the
American public nor The Constitution. This is evident in the fact
that many in both parties try to undermine and discredit the
grassroots movement known as The Tea Party. It is their worse
nightmare. Fortunately it is a nightmare they will have to live with
for a long time. The process then is not to rewrite The U.S.
Constitution but to restore IT and restore power back to the American
people. Only then will the intentions of the " founding fathers " be
realized again !
***************************************************************************
********************************************************
On Feb 27, 7:14 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sage 2: Consider this: If our original Constitution was so
perfect, how has it been possible that government evolved away from
the ideals of the Founding Fathers? It did so because that document
is WEAK! There was an assumption that elected officials would be
motivated to do what is best for the country (ha!). But everyone
knows politicians do what they know gives them the best chance of
getting re elected. Making socialist-communist promises to the lazy
wasn't nixed by any language of the Constitution. But my New
Constitution will hang for treason anyone advocating socialism—the
anti-thesis of the democratic ideals of the Founding Fathers. I
suspect that you are far more left than the country can tolerate.
Please give the readers a capsule description of your feelings about
the free-market capitalist system that made the USA great. And about
your ideas on the role of government in such an economy. Thanks. —
John A. Armistead, — Patriot —
On Feb 26, 11:11 pm, Sage2<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Keith, Mark et al,
Suffice it to say that OUR Constitution need never be rewritten
nor changed, but from time to time revisited to it's original intent
and meaning, less personal interpretation. " It is what it is " and
was not intended to be anything more nor anything less than that. The
only true recourse the founding fathers wisely gave us was the "
amendment " and even they should be rare and few. We should not try to
fix what ain't broke by breaking that which don't need fixing !
***************************************************************************
*********************************************************
On Feb 26, 6:31 am, KeithInSeoul<[email protected]> wrote:
Greetings from Seoul Korea John!
Uhm.....This seems to me, to be, "Much Ado, About Nothing".....
We'd all like to read your "New Constitution"; but if ya don't want to
share it with the group, that is your perogative.
The purpose of Political Forum is to share political thought, ideas,
commentary and opinion, as well as to comment on government, politics, world
affairs and current events. (And occasionally, pro football and
baseball!) Your posts I find sometimes interesting and usually thought
provoking, so therein lied my initial interest in you posting your, "New
Constitution". It was never my intent to get a shit storm started!
If you take the time to read both Jonathan's and Michael's posts, you will
find that both men are thoughtful, and probably share many of the same
concerns as you do. I consider myself a conservative libertarian, (not so
much a capitalist as I am one who beleives in protection of free market
enterprise, and I believe that there is a distinction between a, "free
market" versus an economic system such as capitalism, of which I also
support and subscribe to. Jonathan and Michael are damn near anarchists,
(and I say that with a smile on my face, I don't think either would agree
with me!!) but the point being, is that instead of taking the route of many
of the nasty, hateful rhetorical smear merchants from the far left, (e.g.;
the Wacko left socialist-elitist Moonbats) who from time to time and on
occasion chime in here; I would like to think that the thoughtful, well
reasoned conservative voices of Politicall Forum can have discussion, as
well as disagreement with a little more civility!
At any rate, have a good Saturday....Mine is almost over!
KeithInSeoul
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:16 PM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:
MJ: You are NOT wanted on this post! In the last few weeks you've
managed to give your cook-booked quotations of others, and your own
breakfast-table-written "constitution" of sorts. But you have not
even gone back into my thread to read about my New Constitution, which
is detailed in essays that highlight the apt portions of my document.
And you obviously have no "Regard$" for anyone but yourself. ***
Since my base philosophy is pro-capitalism and pro minimumist
government, when you attack me—the author-messenger—you are revealing
yourself to be a socialist and probably a communist. If it offends
you that I have figured you out, take your "quotes" and your "regards”
elsewhere. You are not wanted here! — J. A. A. — Patriot
On Feb 25, 10:45 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote:
And yet ANOTHER fallacy spew.
Let's see this panacea of yours. What -- exactly
-- are you afraid of? That it is shit?
Regard$,
--MJ
"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
At 10:36 AM 2/25/2011, you wrote:
Dear MJ: You sir, are a total BUM! What I have written describing my
New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would
fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I
have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of
having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to
zero interaction with individual citizens. ‘My’ government will no
longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be
value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain
records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent.
Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict"
the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of
corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification
enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police
state—with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And
the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I’ve put
them in their place, big time!
You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in
the least having you post your elementary version of "A" constitution
of some kind. Post your God-damned junk constitution under your name,
not mine. I am not playing games, here. If you would like to get
back into anyone's good graces, explain your political philosophy in
two paragraphs or less. Unless I see the words: “I pro-capitalist
and anti-socialist”… included, then I will know for sure that you are
just some HACKER who is back-dooring your socialist-communist ideals.
Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
the latter. — J. A. A. —
On Feb 23, 9:40 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote:
In case anyone missed it ... anyone who ASKS to
see this 'Constitution' ... is labelled as a socialist-communist.
My guess is that this Constitution upholds,
endorses and hails ... socialism. THAT is the
true reason Armistead does not want to post it OR let anyone 'see
it'.
Pity.
Regard$,
--MJ
"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
At 09:33 PM 2/23/2011, you wrote:
Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on
MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist-
communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA!
—
John A. Armistead — Patriot
On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]>
wrote:
How does John expect to implement his New
Constitution if no one is ever
allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the
making.
On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
anyone
else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see
the
entire document so that they can make grandiose
...
read more »
--
"Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft"
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
