Einstein, You have no "RIGHT" to continuously SPAM the board with this "Canned" response. This is your last warning.... next time you will go to moderation.
How is that for communist/socialist/party crashing you ignorant putz. On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:40 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Mark, the manner-less party crasher, is undeserving of a reply. — J. > A. A. — > > > On Mar 11, 10:34 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts, > > > > > > records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more > > > > strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the > > > > states having laws governing such. > > > > THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR > > REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES... > > > > English, that is grammatically > > > > > > written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and > > > > shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. > Laws, > > > > documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written > > > > concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average > > > > people, > > > > JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT > CERTAINLY > > IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW > > IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT > ANYONE > > WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT. > > > > or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. > > > > > > Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages > > > > in civil court. > > > > EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE?? > > > > No person shall be punished for violations of laws > > > > > > that: aren�t common knowledge; > > > > SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I > > CAN'T BE PROSECUTED. > > > > disagree with the macro moral consensus > > > > > > of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first > > > > year and passed by less than 60% of the House. > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is > > > undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. — > > > > > On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist > > > > hodge-podge. > > > > > > On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to > straightening- > > > > > out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is... > > > > > > > " Article IV: > > > > > > > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public > acts, > > > > > records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more > > > > > strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the > > > > > states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically > > > > > written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA > and > > > > > shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. > Laws, > > > > > documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written > > > > > concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average > > > > > people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. > > > > > Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for > damages > > > > > in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws > > > > > that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral > > > consensus > > > > > of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary > first > > > > > year and passed by less than 60% of the House. > > > > > Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and > > > > > immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged > with > > > > > treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, > shall, > > > > > on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he > fled, > > > > > be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in > > > > > such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary > servitude� > > > > > except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been > > > > > duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place > > > > > subject to its jurisdiction. > > > > > The House may create new states if such aren�t within the > > > > > jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by > > > > > joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House > can > > > > > make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of > the > > > > > United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of > the > > > > > USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the > > > > > union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall > > > > > protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature > or > > > > > the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened), > > > > > the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence." > > > > > � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > > > > On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. > My > > > > >> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most > > > > >> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The > > > > >> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to > correct > > > > >> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have > to > > > > >> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., > the > > > > >> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or > > > > >> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a > felony > > > > >> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is > > > > >> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that > the > > > > >> presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the > jury > > > > >> has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will > there be > > > > >> the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... > *** > > > > >> Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not > > > > >> guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended! > > > > > > >> I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has > said > > > > >> anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with > others. > > > > >> Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System: > > > > > > >> "Article III: > > > > > > >> Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court > and > > > > >> such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is > to > > > > >> interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of > its > > > > >> rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt > > > > >> laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this > New > > > > >> Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, > never > > > > >> as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, > nor > > > > >> from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of > > > > >> such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal > > > > >> executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new > > > > >> justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may > on > > > > >> good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The > President, > > > > >> or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any > > > > >> nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their > intellect, > > > > >> high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable > > > > >> nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such > > > > >> shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their > judgments, > > > > >> yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They > shall > > > > >> make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never > on > > > > >> their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review > panel > > > > >> shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as > herein, of > > > > >> seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters > > > > >> nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices > aren�t > > > > >> royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently > > > > >> superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered > > > > >> lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor > dress > > > > >> in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall > not > > > > >> socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of > the > > > > >> Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they > attend > > > > >> State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall > not > > > > >> stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be > > > > >> addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not > > > > >> respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or > > > > >> pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials > shall > > > > >> begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: �The justice > system is > > > > >> on trial.� All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are > for > > > > >> one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices > shall > > > > >> not�on their own�reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be > > > devoid of > > > > >> gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor > > > > >> process shall imply that judges or justices represent government > or > > > > >> respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or > justice > > > > >> to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy. > > > > > > >> Section 2& 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the > > > > >> People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or > corruption > > > > >> within any arm of government�including the entire judicial > system� > > > > >> judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during > sentencing, > > > > >> favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of > law > > > > >> enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges, > > > > >> justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for > wrongful > > > > >> acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails > to > > > > >> respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government > > > > >> official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice > may be > > > > >> guilty of a felony. The determination of the > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * *Fila Coffee* *www.filacoffee.com* -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
