Party crashers, like MJ, are undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 19, 9:50 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > It is my understanding that I am a member (in good standing?) of this Group > ([email protected]). > I never claimed to be a moderator. > I did not request a 'discussion'. > I did, however, ask for YOU to support YOUR assertion and explain: > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine 'run counter' when you claim, > "sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients and > their families" > Apparently you cannot support your claim(s) which is why you resort to > spewing fallacy when anyone responds to your posts. > Regard$, > --MJ"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to > life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to > support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident > branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, > commonly called the first law of nature." -- Samuel Adams, November 20, > 1772At 05:42 PM 3/18/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: You are a rude party crasher, > not a moderator. I am not > interested in having a discussion with anyone regarding the specifics > of my New Constitution. As for science, I am the King of the Hill of > patriotic Americans! — J. A. Armistead — > > > On Mar 17, 8:45 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > >In medical facilities all across the country, "medical protocol" > > >sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients > > >and their families. > > > > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine to have 'run counter'? > > Please cite some examples. > > > > Regard$, > > --MJ > > > > Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it > > cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on > > the government, not on private individuals -- that it does not > > prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the > > government -- that it is not a charter _for_ government power, but a > > charter of the citizen's protection _against_ the government. -- > > Alyssa Rosenbaum > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
