Mark, if you feel that way, then you too are a socialist-communist—or else you can't read and comprehend. Attack me in any way, and you attack fair, free-enterprise capitalism and having maximum civil liberties for the vast majority of Americans. Until you can recognize those facts, I have you correctly pegged-through-the-heart with a sharply pointed wooden stake. — NE — > On Mar 22, 11:55 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Kinda like you and your supposed "constitution" that goes beyond the scope > of a REAL Constitution ie. > > *The fundamental law, written or unwritten, that establishes the character > of a government by defining the basic principles to which a society must > conform; by describing the organization of the government and regulation, > distribution, and limitations on the functions of different government > departments; and by prescribing the extent and manner of the exercise of its > sovereign powers.* > * > * > ***Go, get a new life. **what you are doing is a waste of your time and most > importantly....MINE. I have to read all the drivel (your "constitution" > posts) as well as all the meaningful stuff every day on this forum. What you > have written and displayed so far IS A JOKE.* > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > MJ: All of those quotations of others that you cut and paste aren't > > increasing your status in the groups one bit. And haven't you heard? > > It isn't polite to YELL (use larger type size). You are a pest on my > > post, simply because you know I have a lot of things going for me. In > > the perhaps years you have "tooted" your one page constitution, you > > haven't gotten many readers, have you. Please make a "quote" of your > > own worthy of being in Bartlett's. If you can't do that, then you > > should seriously consider getting another (pretend) hobby. — J. A. A. > > — > > > On Mar 21, 10:11 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And yet AGAIN ... you offer a response. > > > SADLY, you offer no support to your claims. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual > > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its > > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and > > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 10:06 AM > > 3/21/2011, you wrote:Party crashers, like MJ, are undeserving of being > > replied to. — J. A. > > > A. — > > > > On Mar 19, 9:50 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It is my understanding that I am a member (in good standing?) of this > > Group ([email protected]). > > > > I never claimed to be a moderator. > > > > I did not request a 'discussion'. > > > > I did, however, ask for YOU to support YOUR assertion and explain: > > > > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine 'run counter' when you > > claim, "sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients > > and their families" > > > > Apparently you cannot support your claim(s) which is why you resort to > > spewing fallacy when anyone responds to your posts. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a > > right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the > > right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are > > evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of > > self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature." -- Samuel > > Adams, November 20, 1772At 05:42 PM 3/18/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: You are a > > rude party crasher, not a moderator. I am not > > > > interested in having a discussion with anyone regarding the specifics > > > > of my New Constitution. As for science, I am the King of the Hill of > > > > patriotic Americans! — J. A. Armistead — > > > > > On Mar 17, 8:45 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >In medical facilities all across the country, "medical protocol" > > > > > >sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients > > > > > >and their families. > > > > > > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine to have 'run counter'? > > > > > Please cite some examples. > > > > > > Regard$, > > > > > --MJ > > > > > > Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it > > > > > cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on > > > > > the government, not on private individuals -- that it does not > > > > > prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the > > > > > government -- that it is not a charter _for_ government power, but a > > > > > charter of the citizen's protection _against_ the government. -- > > > > > Alyssa Rosenbaum > > > > -- > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > *Mark M. Kahle H.* > * > * > *Fila Coffee* > *www.filacoffee.com*
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
