Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:02:15 -0700 

John,
Hopefully you realize that the term "capitalism" was non-existent when the Constitution was written. It first appeared circa 1854. 


Setting that aside, in pure capitalism, also called the free-market 
system, all economic decisions are made _without government 
intervention_. Yet YOUR New Constitution appears to ignore that concept.



Any constitution that wants to promote free market enterprise should by 
necessity prevent government intervention into business.



I must also point out that if one has to codify "maximum civil 
liberties" (as YOUR New Constitution is want to do) it implies that a 
government has control over ones life. Otherwise one would have complete 
liberty without such need.


   *LIBERTY,* n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]

   1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the
   body, or to the will or mind.*

   CIVIL*, a. Relating to the community, or _to the policy and
   government of the citizens and subjects of a state_;



On 03/22/2011 03:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote:

Mark, if you feel that way, then you too are a socialist-communist—or
else you can't read and comprehend.  Attack me in any way, and you
attack fair, free-enterprise capitalism and having maximum civil
liberties for the vast majority of Americans.  Until you can recognize
those facts, I have you correctly pegged-through-the-heart with a
sharply pointed wooden stake.  — NE —
On Mar 22, 11:55 am, Mark<[email protected]>  wrote:

Kinda like you and your supposed "constitution" that goes beyond the scope
of a REAL Constitution ie.

*The fundamental law, written or unwritten, that establishes the character
of a government by defining the basic principles to which a society must
conform; by describing the organization of the government and regulation,
distribution, and limitations on the functions of different government
departments; and by prescribing the extent and manner of the exercise of its
sovereign powers.*
*
*
***Go, get a new life. **what you are doing is a waste of your time and most
importantly....MINE. I have to read all the drivel (your "constitution"
posts) as well as all the meaningful stuff every day on this forum. What you
have written and displayed so far IS A JOKE.*

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:










MJ:  All of those quotations of others that you cut and paste aren't
increasing your status in the groups one bit.  And haven't you heard?
It isn't polite to YELL (use larger type size).  You are a pest on my
post, simply because you know I have a lot of things going for me.  In
the perhaps years you have "tooted" your one page constitution, you
haven't gotten many readers, have you.  Please make a "quote" of your
own worthy of being in Bartlett's.  If you can't do that, then you
should seriously consider getting another (pretend) hobby.  — J. A. A.
—
On Mar 21, 10:11 am, MJ<[email protected]>  wrote:

And yet AGAIN ... you offer a response.
SADLY, you offer no support to your claims.
Regard$,
--MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual

legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient
facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its
enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and
using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 10:06 AM
3/21/2011, you wrote:Party crashers, like MJ, are undeserving of being
replied to.  — J. A.

A. —
On Mar 19, 9:50 pm, MJ<[email protected]>  wrote:

It is my understanding that I am a member (in good standing?) of this

Group ([email protected]).

I never claimed to be a moderator.
I did not request a 'discussion'.
I did, however, ask for YOU to support YOUR assertion and explain:
   What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine 'run counter' when you

claim, "sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
and their families"

Apparently you cannot support your claim(s) which is why you resort to

spewing fallacy when anyone responds to your posts.

Regard$,
--MJ"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a

right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the
right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are
evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of
self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature." -- Samuel
Adams, November 20, 1772At 05:42 PM 3/18/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ:  You are a
rude party crasher, not a moderator.  I am not

interested in having a discussion with anyone regarding the specifics
of my New Constitution.  As for science, I am the King of the Hill of
patriotic Americans!  — J. A. Armistead —
On Mar 17, 8:45 pm, MJ<[email protected]>  wrote:

In medical facilities all across the country, "medical protocol"
sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
and their families.

What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine to have 'run counter'?
Please cite some examples.
Regard$,
--MJ
Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it
cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on
the government, not on private individuals -- that it does not
prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the
government -- that it is not a charter _for_ government power, but a
charter of the citizen's protection _against_ the government. --
Alyssa Rosenbaum

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
*Mark M. Kahle H.*
*
*
*Fila Coffee*
*www.filacoffee.com*


--

Never, ever interact with a government official without having a 
recorder running.



Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft 
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum


* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



























					Reply via email to