Folks: Apparently, MJ is incapable of reasoning. He supposes that
since my "ideal" (not mandated in my New Constitution) government
would have ZERO outlays to individual citizens, i.e., no SS, Medicare,
Medicaid, nor Unemployment, that that shows me to be a socialist. Can
you believe it?!
<sigh>
How a Government programs the STEALS from person
A in order to give to person B will be
'privatized' not being provided notwithstanding,
the portion that continues to embrace socialism,
of course, was "while continuing to "cover" only
those older or sicker people who have no other
means of surviving or of getting first rate
care". Like the woman who finally agrees on her
price being a 'prostitute', so too is yours an embrace of socialism.
Sad isn't it, that Armistead is reduced to
projecting his shortcomings onto others.
It is also noted that you AVOIDED the second
example (like the misdirection you attempt on the
first) of your socialist tendencies.
Socialism and communism (the ideal of Barack Obama)
have government providing everything and controlling everything.
Government 'providing' everything is not required
for socialism's myriad of children.
I want government to provide next to nothing and to control next to
nothing.
Except what excerpts of your Constitution you
have provided does not bolster such a claim.
A properly functioning free enterprise system can do those
thing, AND allow the maximum FAIR prosperity for the maximum number of
Americans!
And yet your own brand of utopian socialism raises its head again.
MJ is revealing himself to be a socialist-communist bent on retarding
my efforts to promote my New Constitution. He and Jonathan Ashley
aren't wanting to save the USA, but to have the USA fail. A person
can be either FOR me or AGAINST me. 100% of those who are against me
are criminal, socialist-communists like OUTLAW Barack Obama. — John
Your fantasies and fallacies may aid you in
retaining that pleasing vision, but they do little to those who grasp reality.
I certainly understand your need to pretend your
embraces of socialism are really not. I can also
understand your desire for baseless
'name-calling'. I am quite certain that OTHERS do as well.
Regard$,
--MJ
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than
sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr
A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Mar 21, 10:26 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and
communism are the anti-thesis of a
representative republic or a democracy. My New
Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the
People and will fire, jail or hang those in
government who support socialism and
communism. When you attack my New Constitution
with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties
person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J.
A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same
person:I am personally recommending that Social
Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment
Insurance ALL be privatized—while continuing to
"cover" only those older or sicker people who
have no other means of surviving or of getting
first rate care. The implications are rather
OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.
> There is ALSO this from the same
person:Businesses or professions meeting
licensing standards germane to the type and
scope of work such perform, and being regularly
apprised of substantive new developments, may
control their own work without governmental
sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to
be other than self-trained to maintain
continuing competency for doing safe work
within their chosen type. Professionals
qualified by training, testing and experience
who perform safe and acceptable work within an
area of their competency shall not be
sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job
class or licensing jurisdiction—beyond fair
registration cost. No more than 25% of
regulatory board members shall have been
employed in the profession or industry
regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this
'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR
that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.
> <sigh> Sad.
> Regard$,
> --MJThere is simply no other choice than
this: either abstain from interference in the
free play of the market, or to delegate the
entire management of production and
distribution to the government. Either
capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
