Folks: MJ—the lying, deranged, yelling, socialist-communist, party crasher—is undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 22, 6:43 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > And yet you AGAIN provide a response. > You will be hard-pressed to PROVE your silly assertion that I am somehow a > "deranged, socialist-communist" ... but I suggest you do so. > There is a pattern here ... you provide absurd claims/assertions ... others > 'call' you on it -- usually requesting substantiation ... you pitch a fit and > spew fallacy while calling names. > Regard$, > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. > It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring > strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using > political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:38 PM 3/22/2011, you > wrote:MJ, the deranged, socialist-communist, party crasher is undeserving of > being replied to. — J. A. A. — > > > On Mar 22, 12:57 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Folks: Apparently, MJ is incapable of reasoning. He supposes that > > >since my "ideal" (not mandated in my New Constitution) government > > >would have ZERO outlays to individual citizens, i.e., no SS, Medicare, > > >Medicaid, nor Unemployment, that that shows me to be a socialist. Can > > >you believe it?! > > > > <sigh> > > How a Government programs the STEALS from person > > A in order to give to person B will be > > 'privatized' not being provided notwithstanding, > > the portion that continues to embrace socialism, > > of course, was "while continuing to "cover" only > > those older or sicker people who have no other > > means of surviving or of getting first rate > > care". Like the woman who finally agrees on her > > price being a 'prostitute', so too is yours an embrace of socialism. > > > > Sad isn't it, that Armistead is reduced to > > projecting his shortcomings onto others. > > > > It is also noted that you AVOIDED the second > > example (like the misdirection you attempt on the > > first) of your socialist tendencies. > > > > >Socialism and communism (the ideal of Barack Obama) > > >have government providing everything and controlling everything. > > > > Government 'providing' everything is not required > > for socialism's myriad of children. > > > > > I want government to provide next to nothing and to control next to > > >nothing. > > > > Except what excerpts of your Constitution you > > have provided does not bolster such a claim. > > > > > A properly functioning free enterprise system can do those > > >thing, AND allow the maximum FAIR prosperity for the maximum number of > > >Americans! > > > > And yet your own brand of utopian socialism raises its head again. > > > > >MJ is revealing himself to be a socialist-communist bent on retarding > > >my efforts to promote my New Constitution. He and Jonathan Ashley > > >aren't wanting to save the USA, but to have the USA fail. A person > > >can be either FOR me or AGAINST me. 100% of those who are against me > > >are criminal, socialist-communists like OUTLAW Barack Obama. — John > > > > Your fantasies and fallacies may aid you in > > retaining that pleasing vision, but they do little to those who grasp > > reality. > > > > I certainly understand your need to pretend your > > embraces of socialism are really not. I can also > > understand your desire for baseless > > 'name-calling'. I am quite certain that OTHERS do as well. > > > > Regard$, > > --MJ > > > > Nothing in the world is more dangerous than > > sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > >On Mar 21, 10:26 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and > > > communism are the anti-thesis of a > > > representative republic or a democracy. My New > > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the > > > People and will fire, jail or hang those in > > > government who support socialism and > > > communism. When you attack my New Constitution > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking > > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties > > > person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J. > > > A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same > > > person:I am personally recommending that Social > > > Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment > > > Insurance ALL be privatized—while continuing to > > > "cover" only those older or sicker people who > > > have no other means of surviving or of getting > > > first rate care. The implications are rather > > > OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism. > > > > There is ALSO this from the same > > > person:Businesses or professions meeting > > > licensing standards germane to the type and > > > scope of work such perform, and being regularly > > > apprised of substantive new developments, may > > > control their own work without governmental > > > sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to > > > be other than self-trained to maintain > > > continuing competency for doing safe work > > > within their chosen type. Professionals > > > qualified by training, testing and experience > > > who perform safe and acceptable work within an > > > area of their competency shall not be > > > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job > > > class or licensing jurisdiction—beyond fair > > > registration cost. No more than 25% of > > > regulatory board members shall have been > > > employed in the profession or industry > > > regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism. > > > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this > > > 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR > > > that the author cannot support what drivel he presents. > > > > <sigh> Sad. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJThere is simply no other choice than > > > this: either abstain from interference in the > > > free play of the market, or to delegate the > > > entire management of production and > > > distribution to the government. Either > > > capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises > > > > >-- > > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
