Folks: A blushing, almost-kid-like Glenn Beck was on Bill O'Reilly's TV program this week. It was discussed whether The Donald's ideas for dealing with our economic woes make him a viable candidate for President. O'Reilly said, "Yes." But Beck said he would prefer a candidate who "just speaks the truth" (rather than one who has an actual PLAN that works). As a regular laugher (mostly) at Glenn Beck's e4 shows, his blackboards and shuffling of photos to incriminate people have gotten old fast. His memorable shows are now about one per month, where they used to be about one out of three. In essence, he has run out of material. His having “oh-isn't-that-sweat” shows like Mike Huckabee isn't improving the chances the USA will survive. Nor is Beck’s delusion that our present broke, broke government can be fixed if only the voters can be told... "the truth". Beck is going on faith that towns (like in Ohio) can be saved and countries, too, if only the good people in his viewing audience can get the word...
At Fox News only two people stand out as selling the conservative route to salvation for the USA: Stu Varney and Andrew Napolitano. Sean Hannity continues to shoot-himself-in-the-foot by having Bob Beckel, the socialist, Obama-loving traitor as his regular guest. "Bob is a good friend," Hannity says. Anyone having Beckel as a friend isn't fit to have air time in this country. My New Constitution says: "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the freedom of speech; ***the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment— being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the free consent of the apt parties." "The freedom of a fair and pro democracy press..." means that NO person hired by the media—as consultants, commentators or otherwise— shall be allowed air time or print space to promote socialist or communist ideals without that medium forfeiting their license. Folks, "FAIR AND BALANCED" is pushing the USA to the brink of destruction! Unless and until FOX News begins talking about saving the USA rather than playing-up our many conflicts, for monetary (Jewish) gain, they aren't worthy of any "conservative" acclaim. Britt Hume and Chris Wallace, et. al are hurting the USA with every liberal word they speak. O'Reilly—on conversational rudeness alone (interrupting and wrongly summarizing what the guest wishes to say)—should be fired, immediately. Apparently, if rudeness gets... viewers, FOX is in favor of it. I invite any of the readers to state views about FOX that might be positive. For me, the corporate culture, there, is neutralizing most potentially helpful aspects. Respectfully submitted, — John A. Armistead — Patriot AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics Those who might be interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." Such is available at Amazon and B & N. > On Apr 1, 2:29 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Talk, alone, can’t save the US economy and social order. > > This week Glenn Beck compared Judaism and Islam. He’s right that Jews > are less harsh in dealing with ‘prohibited’ activities than Muslims. > But, apparently, Beck hasn’t considered the “hidden dangers” posed by > the Jews in Israel that hurt the chances the world can avoid humanity- > threatening conflicts. To wit: Following WWII, and the admittedly > terrible Holocaust, Jews were a race without a nation. Over the ages > Jews had had legitimate claim to much of the Holy Land. But that land > had since ceded to those of the Muslim faith. By force of armed > conflict, Jews confiscated the land of Muslims without fair > compensation. Though they had the ‘nation’ they so desired, it was a > nation obtained by immoral acts, including murder, covetousness and > grand theft. In “celebration” of the new nation of Israel, the USA > formed an alliance to protect Israel from armed aggression. Isn’t it > ironic that our country had not considered it… “worthy” to come to the > aid of those Muslims driven from the Holy Land? > > Because the US regularly sides with Jewish crooks and uses our > military might to neutralize those who are only seeking justice, the > USA has become a despised nation. Our capitalist successes have made > us look like crooks in those realms, too. Thousands of Americans have > died and are dying in the wars being fought. And perhaps millions of > Americans, and that many more of our allies, are now living in fear of > terrorism… Such would NOT be the case if Jews hadn’t felt “entitled” > to be crooks because of the Holocaust. True to form, Jews take every > opportunity for selfish gain, without considering the morality of > their actions. > > Muslims deserve to be treated fairly. Understandably, the nation of > Israel is an affront to the moral sensibilities of Muslims. My book, > “The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity”, touts how FAIR > capitalist successes—evenly spread throughout all the peoples of the > world—can foster world peace, harmony and prosperity. Such successes > can be more profound than ever experienced by the vast majority of > Muslims. *** As I see it, Israel has a moral obligation to help > foster capitalist successes within Muslim nations. Unless they > willingly do so, the world will remain just hours away from a world > war more terrible than anyone can imagine, and more terrible than any > of the ‘punishments’ Muslims use on those breaking their rules—beyond > which Glenn Beck, apparently, has not seen. > > Instead of the trillions of dollars being spent to defend Israel and > to fight their wars for them, that money should be spent to equitably > turn Israel into a model two-race nation. That’s just a concept, mind > you. I can envision an Architectural Master Plan that layers and > weaves quality working and living spaces on the limited land > available. Holy places common to both religions should become neutral > territory, with wise controlled-access being allowed for all who > respect the sanctity of the spaces. Where there are now rock piles, > there should become gardens! The goal should be to once again make > Israel a safe destination for those interested in religious history. > The Jewish Temple, at least partially, should be reconstructed, NOT as > an affront to those of other faiths, but as a tribute to the > technological achievements of those from other ages. Muslim places of > high importance should be developed for high purposes, too. > > Progress toward peace and prosperity can happen rapidly, IF Muslims > will start correcting their very bad public relations—like yesterday. > When the Koran was written, the world was composed largely of warring > barbarians. Religious ritual was a way to separate friend from foe. > The more loyal a follower, the more committed that person was to the > rituals of his faith. Intended or not, that “empty ritual”, which I > abhor, has brainwashed Muslims till they are… the most mass-minded > people on Earth. Muslims have little or no individual moral > sensibility to question the harsh punishments of ‘sinners’. Their > only standard is a largely barbaric religious code that has never been > brought into the civilized age. > > Glenn Beck talks about the billions of ‘bad’ Muslims. Where are > others, such as me, to propose that there be concerted efforts to make > this world economically and socially FAIR within every nation? I’m > betting that terrorism and wars won’t even be considered, once Muslims > start sharing in the simple capitalist successes that countries like > the USA and Israel have for too long kept the knack-for-obtaining > secret from others. We live on one, common, planet Earth, people! > Teaching capitalism for the benefit of the uninitiated, will > eventually benefit every one of us in the long run. That is my hope > and dream! > > Respectfully submitted, > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > AKA NoEinstein on sci.physics news group. > > On Mar 13, 11:51 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Folks: As closely as possible, following the outline of our original > > Constitution, is the attached Article from my New Constitution.: > > > "Article V: > > > Section 1, 2 & 3: Whenever 50% of the House deems necessary, the > > House may propose amendments to the New Constitution, or call a > > convention for proposing amendments; such may be ratified in a one > > day, direct referendum of the People of all the states and > > territories, provided 60% of the registered voters who vote concur. > > The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the > > authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, > > and judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state > > constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or > > job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and > > judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and > > local governments—and all employees of those who regularly deal with > > the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the > > entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such. > > No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification > > for any office, public trust or job. > > To form more perfect government, the House may authorize tests of > > variations of government or laws that are, in the main, consistent > > with the intents of this New Constitution. With the assent of 55% of > > the legislature or legislatures of the state(s) involved, such tests > > may encompass one or several states for a period of time sufficient to > > evaluate performance. Subsequently, the House may vote to pass laws > > of national scope on the issues tested. Conflicts arising from the > > test(s) shall be resolved in the courts using this New Constitution > > and apt federal laws, but with no intent at any time to punish those > > persons, groups or states for their involvement in the test, done for > > the common good." > > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > Those who are interested are invited to read my just-published book, > > "The Shortest Distance, Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & > > N.). Thanks! > > > On Mar 11, 10:22 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Folks: Some shallow, at Google or otherwise, changed the title of > > > this post to “… Empty Rhetoric” rather than “… Empty Ritual”. I was > > > unable to reply and to have the latter, correct name of my original > > > post be included. That’s important so all excerpts from my New > > > Constitution can be found under one heading. > > > > Note: The reason I used “… Empty Ritual” relates as much to religions > > > and social habits as it does to our government—which is more > > > interested in form and process than in getting results that will be > > > beneficial to the vast majority (60% plus) of Americans. > > > > I am cutting, pasting and re posting the last two replies I made to > > > Keith in Koln. > > > > Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My > > > father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most > > > frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The > > > "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct > > > the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to > > > experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the > > > police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or > > > not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony > > > for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is > > > latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the > > > presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury > > > has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be > > > the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... *** > > > Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not > > > guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended! > > > > I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said > > > anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others. > > > Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System: > > > > "Article III: > > > > Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and > > > such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to > > > interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its > > > rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt > > > laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New > > > Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never > > > as part of any > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
