Folks: A blushing, almost-kid-like Glenn Beck was on Bill O'Reilly's
TV program this week. It was discussed whether The Donald's ideas for
dealing with our economic woes make him a viable candidate for
President. O'Reilly said, "Yes." But Beck said he would prefer a
candidate who "just speaks the truth" (rather than one who has an
actual PLAN that works). As a regular laugher (mostly) at Glenn
Beck's e4 shows, his blackboards and shuffling of photos to
incriminate people have gotten old fast. His memorable shows are now
about one per month, where they used to be about one out of three. In
essence, he has run out of material. His having “oh-isn't-that-sweat”
shows like Mike Huckabee isn't improving the chances the USA will
survive. Nor is Beck’s delusion that our present broke, broke
government can be fixed if only the voters can be told... "the
truth". Beck is going on faith that towns (like in Ohio) can be saved
and countries, too, if only the good people in his viewing audience
can get the word...
At Fox News only two people stand out as selling the conservative
route to salvation for the USA: Stu Varney and Andrew Napolitano.
Sean Hannity continues to shoot-himself-in-the-foot by having Bob
Beckel, the socialist, Obama-loving traitor as his regular guest.
"Bob is a good friend," Hannity says. Anyone having Beckel as a
friend isn't fit to have air time in this country. My New
Constitution says:
"1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech; ***the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or
other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right
of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches
or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning
government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive,
helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly
read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances
or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond
to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the
press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside
of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall
be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
display active public records without the free consent of the apt
parties."
"The freedom of a fair and pro democracy press..." means that NO
person hired by the media—as consultants, commentators or otherwise—
shall be allowed air time or print space to promote socialist or
communist ideals without that medium forfeiting their license. Folks,
"FAIR AND BALANCED" is pushing the USA to the brink of destruction!
Unless and until FOX News begins talking about saving the USA rather
than playing-up our many conflicts, for monetary (Jewish) gain, they
aren't worthy of any "conservative" acclaim. Britt Hume and Chris
Wallace, et. al are hurting the USA with every liberal word they
speak. O'Reilly—on conversational rudeness alone (interrupting and
wrongly summarizing what the guest wishes to say)—should be fired,
immediately. Apparently, if rudeness gets... viewers, FOX is in favor
of it.
I invite any of the readers to state views about FOX that might be
positive. For me, the corporate culture, there, is neutralizing most
potentially helpful aspects.
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics
Those who might be interested are invited to read my book: "The
Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." Such is available at
Amazon and B& N.
On Apr 1, 2:29 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Talk, alone, can’t save the US economy and social order.
This week Glenn Beck compared Judaism and Islam. He’s right that Jews
are less harsh in dealing with ‘prohibited’ activities than Muslims.
But, apparently, Beck hasn’t considered the “hidden dangers” posed by
the Jews in Israel that hurt the chances the world can avoid humanity-
threatening conflicts. To wit: Following WWII, and the admittedly
terrible Holocaust, Jews were a race without a nation. Over the ages
Jews had had legitimate claim to much of the Holy Land. But that land
had since ceded to those of the Muslim faith. By force of armed
conflict, Jews confiscated the land of Muslims without fair
compensation. Though they had the ‘nation’ they so desired, it was a
nation obtained by immoral acts, including murder, covetousness and
grand theft. In “celebration” of the new nation of Israel, the USA
formed an alliance to protect Israel from armed aggression. Isn’t it
ironic that our country had not considered it… “worthy” to come to the
aid of those Muslims driven from the Holy Land?
Because the US regularly sides with Jewish crooks and uses our
military might to neutralize those who are only seeking justice, the
USA has become a despised nation. Our capitalist successes have made
us look like crooks in those realms, too. Thousands of Americans have
died and are dying in the wars being fought. And perhaps millions of
Americans, and that many more of our allies, are now living in fear of
terrorism… Such would NOT be the case if Jews hadn’t felt “entitled”
to be crooks because of the Holocaust. True to form, Jews take every
opportunity for selfish gain, without considering the morality of
their actions.
Muslims deserve to be treated fairly. Understandably, the nation of
Israel is an affront to the moral sensibilities of Muslims. My book,
“The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity”, touts how FAIR
capitalist successes—evenly spread throughout all the peoples of the
world—can foster world peace, harmony and prosperity. Such successes
can be more profound than ever experienced by the vast majority of
Muslims. *** As I see it, Israel has a moral obligation to help
foster capitalist successes within Muslim nations. Unless they
willingly do so, the world will remain just hours away from a world
war more terrible than anyone can imagine, and more terrible than any
of the ‘punishments’ Muslims use on those breaking their rules—beyond
which Glenn Beck, apparently, has not seen.
Instead of the trillions of dollars being spent to defend Israel and
to fight their wars for them, that money should be spent to equitably
turn Israel into a model two-race nation. That’s just a concept, mind
you. I can envision an Architectural Master Plan that layers and
weaves quality working and living spaces on the limited land
available. Holy places common to both religions should become neutral
territory, with wise controlled-access being allowed for all who
respect the sanctity of the spaces. Where there are now rock piles,
there should become gardens! The goal should be to once again make
Israel a safe destination for those interested in religious history.
The Jewish Temple, at least partially, should be reconstructed, NOT as
an affront to those of other faiths, but as a tribute to the
technological achievements of those from other ages. Muslim places of
high importance should be developed for high purposes, too.
Progress toward peace and prosperity can happen rapidly, IF Muslims
will start correcting their very bad public relations—like yesterday.
When the Koran was written, the world was composed largely of warring
barbarians. Religious ritual was a way to separate friend from foe.
The more loyal a follower, the more committed that person was to the
rituals of his faith. Intended or not, that “empty ritual”, which I
abhor, has brainwashed Muslims till they are… the most mass-minded
people on Earth. Muslims have little or no individual moral
sensibility to question the harsh punishments of ‘sinners’. Their
only standard is a largely barbaric religious code that has never been
brought into the civilized age.
Glenn Beck talks about the billions of ‘bad’ Muslims. Where are
others, such as me, to propose that there be concerted efforts to make
this world economically and socially FAIR within every nation? I’m
betting that terrorism and wars won’t even be considered, once Muslims
start sharing in the simple capitalist successes that countries like
the USA and Israel have for too long kept the knack-for-obtaining
secret from others. We live on one, common, planet Earth, people!
Teaching capitalism for the benefit of the uninitiated, will
eventually benefit every one of us in the long run. That is my hope
and dream!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on sci.physics news group.
On Mar 13, 11:51 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Folks: As closely as possible, following the outline of our original
Constitution, is the attached Article from my New Constitution.:
"Article V:
Section 1, 2& 3: Whenever 50% of the House deems necessary, the
House may propose amendments to the New Constitution, or call a
convention for proposing amendments; such may be ratified in a one
day, direct referendum of the People of all the states and
territories, provided 60% of the registered voters who vote concur.
The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the
authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land,
and judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
local governments—and all employees of those who regularly deal with
the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
for any office, public trust or job.
To form more perfect government, the House may authorize tests of
variations of government or laws that are, in the main, consistent
with the intents of this New Constitution. With the assent of 55% of
the legislature or legislatures of the state(s) involved, such tests
may encompass one or several states for a period of time sufficient to
evaluate performance. Subsequently, the House may vote to pass laws
of national scope on the issues tested. Conflicts arising from the
test(s) shall be resolved in the courts using this New Constitution
and apt federal laws, but with no intent at any time to punish those
persons, groups or states for their involvement in the test, done for
the common good."
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
Those who are interested are invited to read my just-published book,
"The Shortest Distance, Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.&
N.). Thanks!
On Mar 11, 10:22 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Folks: Some shallow, at Google or otherwise, changed the title of
this post to “… Empty Rhetoric” rather than “… Empty Ritual”. I was
unable to reply and to have the latter, correct name of my original
post be included. That’s important so all excerpts from my New
Constitution can be found under one heading.
Note: The reason I used “… Empty Ritual” relates as much to religions
and social habits as it does to our government—which is more
interested in form and process than in getting results that will be
beneficial to the vast majority (60% plus) of Americans.
I am cutting, pasting and re posting the last two replies I made to
Keith in Koln.
Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
"starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury
has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be
the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... ***
Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not
guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!
I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said
anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others.
Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:
"Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any
...
read more »
