I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley < [email protected]> wrote:
> John, > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that differs > from yours. How fascist of you! > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM. > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how great > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama. > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about a > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or their > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a game > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a candidate > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the > people! — J. A. A. — > > On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > John, > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do. > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean when > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more influence > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course, that > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy." > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means and why > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your world. > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum is > about up. > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities > vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles > than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs > counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st Amendment > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other > medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark is > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because I > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if Google > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste! � J. A. A. � > > -- > > Freedom Is Always Illegal. > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity > Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > > > -- > Freedom Is Always Illegal. > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity > Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
