Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting... business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless! > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind, > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A. > — > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > John, > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that > > > differs > > > from yours. How fascist of you! > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM. > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how great > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama. > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the > > > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about a > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or their > > > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a game > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing > > > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a candidate > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the > > > people! — J. A. A. — > > > > On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do. > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean when > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more influence > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course, that > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy." > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means and why > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your world. > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum is > > > about up. > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities > > > vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles > > > than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st Amendment > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other > > > medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark is > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because I > > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if Google > > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste! � J. A. A. � > > > > -- > > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal. > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity > > > Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > > > <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > > > > -- > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal. > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity > > > Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> > > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > > *Mark M. Kahle H.* > > * > > * > > * > > * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
