Johnathan is no Anarchist... but your cry (in you rantings and your "constitution") for "more democracy" IS indeed socialistic communism.
On Apr 25, 7:15 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark: Tell that to J. Ashley. He's holding up Belgium as the ideal > of the world, and Jonathan is an out-and-out anarchist. — J. A. A. — > > On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > There is no "anarchy in Belgium: > > *an·ar·chy*/ˈanərkē/Noun > > 1. A state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority. > > 2. Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as > > a political ideal. > > > It is not history, it is current events. > > > If you are writing a constitution you should have known this. You should > > also know that absolute Democracy, absolute Communism and Socialism are for > > the most part identical in practice (if it were possible) > > > To say we need more Democracy as you often do is the same as saying we need > > more Communism and or Socialism.... > > > Just how ignorant are you ?? > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Mark: Please find yourself a history buff. I'm not the least > > > interested in anarchy, in Belgium or anywhere! — J. A. A. — > > > > On Apr 22, 4:33 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And it still functions without the lawmakers.... Go figure. > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Ashley < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > John, > > > > > > "In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related programs > > > > > as > > > a > > > > > percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), Denmark ranks first, > > > > > spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its welfare-related programs. > > > Next > > > > > is Sweden (nearly 29 percent), followed by France, Germany, Belgium, > > > > > Switzerland, Austria, and Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in the > > > middle of > > > > > the pack in 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The United States > > > ranks > > > > > near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending less than 15 > > > percent of > > > > > its GDP on social welfare programs. The United States ranks just ahead > > > of > > > > > Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea." > > > > > >http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for > > > > > handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout. > > > > > Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New > > > > > Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings > > > > > business! — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those > > > in > > > > > the United States? > > > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be > > > > > in civil war... � J. A. A. � > > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > John, > > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more > > > than > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make > > > much > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra- > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone, > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages' > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � > > > Patriot > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > John, > > > > > Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of > > > > > anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer > > > > > questions posed to you.) > > > > > On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I > > > > > suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government. > > > > > Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on > > > > > your own. � J. A. A. � > > > > > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution. > > > > > On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system > > > > > that made this country great; and by supposing that government should > > > > > control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask > > > > > that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a > > > > > socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are > > > > > just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead � > > > > > Patriot > > > > > On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > John, > > > > > That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites > > > based > > > > > on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your > > > > > credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression > > > means. > > > > > That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to > > > > > the > > > > > USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems > > > > > ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off > > > this > > > > > tremendous task? > > > > > On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > > > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google > > > > > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very > > > > > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the > > > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit > > > > > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation > > > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed? > > > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill > > > > > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > > > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs > > > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused > > > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who > > > > > ever lived, including Hitler. > > > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and > > > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested, > > > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for > > > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > > > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed > > > > > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so > > > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a > > > > > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some > > > > > couch- > > > > > time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Einstein, > > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or > > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard > > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It > > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law. > > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s). > > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" > > > > > in > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such > > > > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful > > > > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims > > > > > feel. > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA > > > > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying, > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has > > > > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads > > > > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85% > > > > > of > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
