Your absolute ignorance of what does and does not work in the world (especially Belgium) is beaming brightly with that answer. Without the examples to follow and those not to follow it is quite impossible to create any form of government that has a prayer of working.
As to the obvious disregard for idea exchange whether it be by a group or an individual with their representative in government .... good luck with that. I have an unalienable right to speak to whom I please on any subject I please, both corporately and individually. I have an absolute and undeniable right to protect my interests in any format and in any country I so choose. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:41 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for > handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout. > Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New > Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings > business! — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those in > > the United States? > > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be > > > in civil war... � J. A. A. � > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> John, > > > > >> It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without > > >> government. Belgium has been without a national government for more > than > > >> 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make > much > > >> of a difference in their daily lives." > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > >>> Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra- > > >>> conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone, > > >>> because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > > >>> deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact > > >>> opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative > > >>> than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages' > > >>> within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" > of > > >>> no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is > > >>> having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � > Patriot > > >>> On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> John, > > >>>> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of > > >>>> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer > > >>>> questions posed to you.) > > >>>> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>>>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I > > >>>>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning > government. > > >>>>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on > > >>>>> your own. � J. A. A. � > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution. > > >>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>>>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist > system > > >>>>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government > should > > >>>>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even > ask > > >>>>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a > > >>>>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% > are > > >>>>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. > Armistead � > > >>>>>>> Patriot > > >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected] > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> John, > > >>>>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades > websites based > > >>>>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about > your > > >>>>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of > expression means. > > >>>>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm > to the > > >>>>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" > seems > > >>>>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull > off this > > >>>>>>>> tremendous task? > > >>>>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > > >>>>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. > Google > > >>>>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are > very > > >>>>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from > the > > >>>>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who > commit > > >>>>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on > moderation > > >>>>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be > killed? > > >>>>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who > kill > > >>>>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > > >>>>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of > jobs > > >>>>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has > caused > > >>>>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person > who > > >>>>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler. > > >>>>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our > government and > > >>>>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard > arrested, > > >>>>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the > Constitution for > > >>>>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > > >>>>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's > viewed > > >>>>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you > are so > > >>>>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having > a > > >>>>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get > some couch- > > >>>>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> Einstein, > > >>>>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the > present, or > > >>>>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the > standard > > >>>>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. > It > > >>>>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US > law. > > >>>>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > > >>>>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their > law(s). > > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of > "reasoning" in > > >>>>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining > why Jews > > >>>>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be > such > > >>>>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for > successful > > >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep > wounds Muslims > > >>>>>>>>>>> feel. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that > the USA > > >>>>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) > saying > > >>>>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > > >>>>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my > New > > >>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. > If you > > >>>>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm > saying, > > >>>>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New > Constitution has > > >>>>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. > The last > > >>>>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted > heads > > >>>>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for > the 85% > > >>>>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become > available. > > >>>>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented > as part of > > >>>>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for > why this > > >>>>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help > speed things > > >>>>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. > Armistead � > > >>>>>>>>>>> Patriot > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey John! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, > Mark and MJ are > > >>>>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise > and one of them > > >>>>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack > Literal Truth might > > >>>>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next > missive! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein< > [email protected]>wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another > essay > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our > political-governmental > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic > resources, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and > fix-up. The > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the > liberty > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any > more fortunes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. > By adapting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be > assured! � John > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The > Shortest Distance; > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). > I'm thrilled that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as > a cure for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book > explains > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple > things can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving > conducting... > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know > what I am > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an > open mind, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin > didn't give a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed > them by the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will > harm ordinary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! > � J. A. A. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> � > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
