So long as the US Code is unconstitutional, we're kinda done.

On May 3, 10:55 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> You keep looking in the WRONG places.
> Try THIS:http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txtPoint to the Article, 
> Section and Clause or Amendment.
> [do remember that naturalization deals with Citizenship and NOT immigration]
> Regard$,
> --MJThe Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control 
> immigration. Nor does it say anything about illegal aliens. ... Sadly, 
> lawmakers have repeatedly interpreted this silence as license for 
> ill-conceived legislation. Congress began barring entry to the nation in 1875 
> with prostitutes and convicts. Soon, all sorts of people fell short of 
> congressional glory: ex-convicts in 1882, along with Chinese citizens, 
> lunatics, and idiots. Paupers, polygamists, and people suffering from 
> infectious diseases or insanity made the list in 1891, while the illiterate 
> were banned in 1917. -- Becky AkersAt 10:49 AM 5/3/2011, you wrote:I just 
> don't know what to say, other than 
> this:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/usc_sup_01_8_10_12_20_II_30_IV.html
> On May 3, 10:42 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Greg, The fed is not given the right to control immigration, just to see
> > that migration "between the states" is unfettered, but the States are.....
> > they simply may not control movements at "Interstate" crossings... there is
> > no limit placed at ports of foreign entry for the states.
> >
> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:37 AM, GregfromBoston 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Want better schools ?? move east
> > > -------------------------
> >
> > > East of me is the ocean.
> >
> > > Point taken, and I have made the same point RE Dept of Education is
> > > illegal BECAUSE of the very amendment you cite.
> >
> > > But on one hand, MJ claims, the US govt has no power over immigration,
> > > because its not explicit in the constitution (Naturalization,
> > > schmation), and that the FDA is illegal, yet then goes on to purport
> > > that no, explicit constitutional authority is not requisite.
> >
> > > Allllllllllllllllll-righty then!
> >
> > > On May 3, 10:27 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Greg,
> >
> > > > ALL things not specifically mentioned in the Constitution as the
> > > > responsibility of the Federal Government was to be left to the States to
> > > > each deal with separately.
> >
> > > > What most people do not, or refuse, to see is that the USA was always
> > > meant
> > > > to be a union of 50 separate and sovereign states. Each very distinct 
> > > > and
> > > > offering to its citizens that which suited its specific citizens most.
> > > There
> > > > was never an intension of "One law for all".
> >
> > > > Citizens (and only citizens of the several states) were to be allowed to
> > > > travel freely between the states, There was to be no import/export tax
> > > > between the states only at ports handling foreign trade ...(the biggest
> > > > failure of the Articles of Confederation, and the main reason for the 
> > > > new
> > > > Constitution, and Lincolns excuse for Ft. Sumter...tax collection). Only
> > > the
> > > > President is elected by all and only he was meant to be responsible at
> > > > large. It is the responsibility of Congressmen to represent their
> > > > constituency only (pork was just fine as deals had to be made that would
> > > get
> > > > enough votes...there was very little Federal money to go around),
> > > Senators
> > > > were originally designed to represent the needs of their state only 
> > > > under
> > > > the guiding hand of each governor. The Feds were responsible for only a
> > > VERY
> > > > LIMITED military (basically the "officer corps") with the "standing 
> > > > army"
> > > > made up ENTIRELY of the forces supplied by the states (thus the need to
> > > > "Declare War" only by Congress assembled as their constituents were to 
> > > > be
> > > > "called up")
> >
> > > > Laws about food safety, drugs, taxes, social welfare, medical, schools,
> > > etc.
> > > > are the absolute responsibility of each separate state ..... separately.
> > > > This is what would make different states attractive to different people
> > > and
> > > > cause migration from one to another of both people and industry. States
> > > were
> > > > allowed to sue one another over (literally) bad things flowing
> > > > downstream...this was the interstate control factor... the federal
> > > courts.
> >
> > > > That these things are now dealt with by the Feds is indeed a usurpation
> > > of
> > > > and by the Feds.
> >
> > > > Want better schools ?? move east, The Feds were never meant to make
> > > things
> > > > equal... the states were never meant to be equal, all laws were never
> > > meant
> > > > to be equal....
> >
> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:34 AM, GregfromBoston <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> >
> > > > > Dockside Greeters & Crew (Boston Harbor)
> >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Date: 2011-04-28, 6:55PM EDT
> > > > > Reply to: [email protected] [Errors when replying to
> > > > > ads?]
> >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > > > GREAT SUMMER JOBS!! Work outside or in our ticket booth on Long Wharf
> > > > > or on one of the Boston Harbor Islands as a Dockside Assistant or
> > > > > Guest Services agent for Boston's Best Cruises. We need happy,
> > > > > energetic, outgoing people to provide information and assistance to
> > > > > the public and passengers boarding our vessels for the only official
> > > > > New England Aquarium Whale Watch, Boston Harbor Island Cruises, our
> > > > > Boston Harbor Tour, the Salem Ferry, and the Harbor Express Commuter
> > > > > boats. We are also looking for Cruise Directors and Narrators to work
> > > > > onboard several vessels for additional compensation. Join our crew and
> > > > > enjoy the excitement and fun interacting with the public, guiding
> > > > > passengers to our boats, and generally supporting Boston's finest
> > > > > fleet of passenger vessels. You can help us deliver an outstanding
> > > > > recreational experience in and around Boston Harbor and the Boston
> > > > > Harbor Islands. More than a dozen full time and part time jobs still
> > > > > available right now through Labor Day.
> >
> > > > > Location: Boston Harbor
> >
> > > > > On May 2, 8:49 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > You're being silly.
> > > > > > Where in the constitution does it say government has the power
> > > > > toregulatefood and drugs?
> > > > > > Nowhere ... yet ANOTHER usurpation.The very reason for the US Code
> > > (laws)
> > > > > is to pick up where the
> > > > > > constitution leaves off, AND to limit where it doesn't
> > > > > > ROTFLMAO!
> > > > > > Jeffrey Tucker, Ditch the PlannersNo one so much as suggested such a
> > > > > thing as the US Code in the first hundred years after the US
> > > Constitution
> > > > > was enacted. It would have been only a little longer than the
> > > Constitution
> > > > > itself. The first attempt to create such a compilation of laws 
> > > > > occurred
> > > in
> > > > > 1878 but it languished because no one felt the need to update it. Then
> > > in
> > > > > 1926, in the midst of Prohibition when the feds became deeply involved
> > > in
> > > > > regulating the details of life, Congress made the thing come into
> > > existence.
> > > > > It is printed every six years.An institution was born, though most
> > > people
> > > > > know nothing of it. The next printing will come out in 2012, but the
> > > 2006
> > > > > with annotations was 356 thousand-plus-page volumes that cover every
> > > aspect
> > > > > of life as we know it. The next one will add many new sections and
> > > probably
> > > > > more than 100,000 pages.This is America's central plan -- or
> > > ownGosplan, so
> > > > > to speak -- and it is as elaborate and detailed as any set of laws 
> > > > > that
> > > have
> > > > > ever governed any society in the history of the world. Much of this
> > > central
> > > > > plan is absorbed into our daily lives in ways that we don't notice or
> > >...
>
> read more »

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to