I have replied to a number of your "cut and pastes"; and as EVERYONE in this group can attest, you never, ever respond!
Don't even go there Michael. You're beginning to piss me off. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And you CONTINUE with your meaningless drivel about nonsensical > nothingness. > Several People in THIS forum forward/provide 'discussion starters' ... > articles, quotes, cartoons, etc. > In the instances I have called you on your wanting responses, instead of > addressing these words, concepts and ideas that are presented, you make > meaningless proclamations that could be appended to *any* effort provided by > *anyone* with similar results OR (your favorite) you simply chant > "poopeyhead" as though THAT -- in itself -- has some meaningful refutation > of those words, concepts and ideas. > > Here is your -- what, 4th? -- effort to CONTINUE to obfuscate and avoid the > discussion as it progressed. Can we safely conclude by now that you are > simply giving up on your defense of the statist Gingrich? > > Regard$, > --MJ > > It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that > you would lie if you were in his place. -- H. L. Mencken > > > > > > At 03:56 PM 5/16/2011, you wrote: > > What is it that you have provided to the Group Michael, besides cut and > paste articles from Moonbats and Crackpots? I have at least come forward > (recently) and shown why the "Fallacy Spew" from these Moonbats and > Crackpots is exactly that, and you have yet to post a cognitive opinion > from you, yourself......Come to think of it......Ever. > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:51 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > So your "solution" is to spew MORE fallacy? > You apparently do not grasp the logical argument. > > So why is it you AVOIDED the words, concepts and ideas presented ... > choosing instead to obfuscate and posit MORE fallacy? > > Regard$, > --MJ > > News flash: Republican statists take control of the House over Democrat > statists. Prepare for more socialism, interventionism & imperialism. -- > Jacob Hornberger > > > > At 03:30 PM 5/16/2011, you wrote: > > Michael, > > So, once again, let's review: > > It's okay if the purported "Fallacy spew" comes from the likes of Justin > Raimondo, Lew Rockwell, Laurence Moonbat, Bill Maher, or some other > crackpot, but when a man who has in fact fought the battle for thirty years > for limited government makes a speech that is out of line with what a > majority Democratic Party Congress voted for, and that he was in fact a > member of, and voted against, this somehow makes the man non-credible? > > I think I got it now. > > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
