On May 25, 9:53 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rather than asking me why political parties are unconstitutional, why
> don't you explain why "outsiders" other than our seated public
> officials get to dictate a single thing that goes on in this country.
> Give it your best shot!   — John A. Armistead —  PatriotAs has been explained 
> time and time again, people seek to influence because influence can be 
> mandated -- contrary to the Constitution.

MJ:  Absolutely not!  No person can have (or have others mandate) an
influence greater that our FAIR, Representative Republic will allow!
The political parties constantly try to get more power & influence
than one-person-one vote, and THAT is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!  I've
repeatedly written that the entire space-out primaries are
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because they give the most power to the God-damned
people of IOWA!  The only viable presidential candidate to save the
USA is the one(s) who eschew party affiliation and wasteful press-the-
flesh primaries.  Hear that, Sarah Palin?  — John A. Armistead —
Patriot

> Sadly, your effort -- at least what you have shared -- does NOTHING to 
> eliminate this.
> Legitimate Government secures everyone's right to life and its corollaries 
> <period>.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> (W)e ought to be asking ourselves why corporations and interests groups are 
> willing to give politicians millions of dollars in the first place.  
> Obviously their motives are not altruistic.  Simply put, they do it because 
> the stakes are so high.  They know government controls virtually every aspect 
> of our economy and our lives, and that they must influence government to 
> protect their interests. 
> Our federal government, which was intended to operate as a very limited 
> constitutional republic, has instead become a virtually socialist leviathan 
> that redistributes trillions of dollars.  We can hardly be surprised when 
> countless special interests fight for the money.  The only true solution to 
> the campaign money problem is a return to a proper constitutional government 
> that does not control the economy.  Big government and big campaign money go 
> hand in hand.
> -- Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), "Texas Straight Talk," 2/4/02

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to