Give him the Big Mac !!!!!! MJ, Make arrangements to have that money or coupon sent to you.
Einstein... I am named, degreed, titled and definitely a soul. I do not think anything about you is pure... except your bullshit. On Jun 1, 2:39 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Tell me, MJ, if there are deficiencies in MY New Constitution, then, > why are you the only one trying to point those out? This Memorial > Week vacation has the readership down. But I'll bet you a Big Mac > that you can't find a named soul who will agree with you that my > motives aren't pure. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eb... > > On May 27, 11:34 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > IOW, you cannot support your claims which have been demonstrated to be > > deficient. > > Regard$, > > --MJ > > "Rogues are preferable to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest" -- > > Alexander Dumas, author of "The Count of Monte Cristo."At 08:47 PM > > 5/26/2011, you wrote:MJ: When a 'child', or someone with less > > sophistication, keeps > > questioning authority by asking, "why?", sometimes the best reply is: > > "Because I say so!" You are definitely someone of low > > sophistication. So... "Because I say so, kid!" — J. A. A. — > > > On May 26, 1:35 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You can spew all the fallacious matter you choose, but it remains that > > > you are (hopelessly) confused. > > > Per AIS5C2:Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish > > > its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two > > > thirds, expel a Member.Note that the CONSTITUTION provides the House the > > > power to determine the Rules of its Proceedings. If that body deems > > > Members with certain affiliations to have certain positions/duties, then > > > such is within its purview. > > > The problem occurs when Rules are imposed OUTSIDE of the House itself. > > > This does not make political parties unconstitutional, but instead the > > > advantage providing laws unconstitutional. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJ > > > Several major turning points mark the reversal of this [Constitutional > > > enumerated powers] ethic. The first was the passage in 1913 of the > > > Sixteenth Amendment, which permitted a federal income tax. This was the > > > first major tax that was not levied on a proportional or uniform basis. > > > Hence, it allowed Congress a political free ride: It could provide > > > government benefits to many by imposing a disproportionately heavy tax > > > burden on the wealthy. ... -- Stephen Moore, _Between Power and Liberty_ > > > At 11:19 AM 5/26/2011, you wrote:Dear Pigeon-Dung-for-a-Brain, MJ: The > > > SPIRIT of the Constitution > > > champions FAIRNESS and equality of the power of INDIVIDUALS to control > > > government. The (they were only human) Founding Fathers knew that > > > there were rules needing to be made and laws passed to make this > > > country function. But those naive Founding Fathers had no idea that > > > by giving Congress the 'power' to make its own rules, without any > > > controls over what those rules can be, that Congress would so willing > > > depart from the sacred SPIRIT of the Constitution that is: "Fair play > > > and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!" Having... "rules" > > > that give the power to 'the winning party', and not allocating power > > > to individuals equally, is a SUBVERSION of our sacred Representative > > > (parity) Republic! There is NO ASPECT OF THE MANDATED STRUCTURE OF > > > OUR GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE PEOPLE > > > CONTROL GOVERNMENT RATHER THAN GOVERNMENT CONTROLLING THE PEOPLE!!! > > > Congress, nor the President have the power to vote to take power away > > > from the People. And Congress, nor the President have the authority > > > to do a God-damned THING that is socialist-communist or unfair!!! My > > > New Constitution stipulates that no "rule" of Congress can concentrate > > > power in the hands of any individual or group beyond one-person-one- > > > vote. Political parties, because they are unfair and use leverage NOT > > > granted by the Constitution are, and always have been > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL! You would be well advised NOT to question anything > > > I have done on behalf of the American People, because there is not a > > > Patriot on Earth with my intellect and my devotion to SAVING this > > > country!!! — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > On May 25, 9:49 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Political parties are unconstitutional because they impose a power > > > > structure within Congress that gives the... "power" to the winning > > > > party, rather than having a parity of power on every single issue > > > > voted upon. You are (hopelessly) confused. > > > > Per AIS5C2:Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, > > > > punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence > > > > of two thirds, expel a Member.Note that the CONSTITUTION provides the > > > > House the power to determine the Rules of its Proceedings. If that body > > > > deems Members with certain affiliations to have certain > > > > positions/duties, then such is within its purview. > > > > The problem occurs when Rules are imposed OUTSIDE of the House itself. > > > > This does not make political parties unconstitutional, but instead the > > > > advantage providing laws unconstitutional. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ > > > > Several major turning points mark the reversal of this [Constitutional > > > > enumerated powers] ethic. The first was the passage in 1913 of the > > > > Sixteenth Amendment, which permitted a federal income tax. This was > > > > the first major tax that was not levied on a proportional or uniform > > > > basis. Hence, it allowed Congress a political free ride: It could > > > > provide government benefits to many by imposing a disproportionately > > > > heavy tax burden on the wealthy. ... -- Stephen Moore, _Between Power > > > > and Liberty_ > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
