Political parties are unconstitutional because they impose a power
structure within Congress that gives the... "power" to the winning
party, rather than having a parity of power on every single issue
voted upon. 

You are (hopelessly) confused.
Per AIS5C2:
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
Note that the CONSTITUTION provides the House the power to determine the Rules of its Proceedings. If that body deems Members with certain affiliations to have certain positions/duties, then such is within its purview.

The problem occurs when Rules are imposed OUTSIDE of the House itself. This does not make political parties unconstitutional, but instead the advantage providing laws unconstitutional.

Regard$,
--MJ

Several major turning points mark the reversal of this [Constitutional enumerated powers] ethic.  The first was the passage in 1913 of the Sixteenth Amendment, which permitted a federal income tax.  This was the first major tax that was not levied on a proportional or uniform basis.  Hence, it allowed Congress a political free ride:  It could provide government benefits to many by imposing a disproportionately heavy tax burden on the wealthy.  ...  -- Stephen Moore, _Between Power and Liberty_

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to