Dear MJ: Making the same mistakes over and over? You've described yourself perfectly! — J. A. A. — > On Jun 3, 2:55 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > You repeated the same discredited nonsense -- throwing in a great number of > red herrings -- failing to thwart the reality that has been pointed at for > you. > Regard$, > --MJ > "Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his error. " -- > Marcus Tullius CiceroAt 04:11 PM 6/2/2011, you wrote:No, MJ! Every day, the > US Supreme Court is finding interpretations > that will allow this, but not "that". Does the federal government's > authority to regulate interstate commerce rule, or does the powers > granted to the states clause rule? That, supposedly, will determine > the constitutionality of Obama Care. As I've explained: The Senate > was included ONLY because of the small states' extortion (blackmail). > A Representative Republic is PURE; an oligarchy, such as the US > Senate, is unfair, undemocratic and thus UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Like our > Manchurian Candidate... "President" (gag!), Obama’s being in the White > House makes him no less a TREASONOUS bastard! If you want 100 senile, > career politicians to run things, then why not propose a constitution > without a House of Representatives? For running a government, I'll > take the fair and democracy-like House, over our drag-on-government US > Senate every time! Harry Reid should be out of a job! — J. A. > Armistead — Patriot > > > On Jun 2, 9:25 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps we have highlighted (again) yet another of your difficulties. When > > you ignore common definitions of words, it is difficult to convey your > > message in any meaningful way. > > Constitutional, as noted previously is of or by the Constitution. The > > Senate is constitutional -- by definition. > > Regard$, > > --MJ > > "[Democracy] is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no > > less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of > > socialism, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to > > individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive" -- Westbrook > > Pegler, popular columnist of the 1930s and '40s.At 08:38 PM 5/26/2011, you > > wrote:MJ: What "definition" is that? That an anti-democracy and anti- > > Republic oligarchy has more power than the former two? The US senate > > is THE most corrupt band of career politicians on planet Earth! We > > could do better by just giving the vote to the first 100 people to > > cross Main Street! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > On May 26, 1:32 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Again, Constitutional is of or by the Constitution. > > > The Senate is constitutional -- by definition. > > > Until the removal of the check with Amendment 17 (not properly ratified > > > per Article V), the Senate was the 'representative' of the States -- > > > those entities forming the United States (plural). > > > Contrary to your insistence, the Constitution does not create this idea > > > of mob rule to which you are so enamored and believe will *magically* > > > correct ills. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJ > > > Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass > > > meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. > > > Attitude toward property is communistic ... Attitude toward law is that > > > the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based on > > > deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, or impulse, without > > > restraint or regard to the consequences. Result is demagogism, license, > > > agitation, discontent, anarchy. > > > -- U.S. Army training manual No. 2000-25 (1928-1932)Dear MJ: The > > > Founding Fathers were BLACKMAILED into including a > > > senate, because small states feared being exploited by larger states. > > > The senate is an oligarchy that slaps-in-the-face our Representative > > > Republic. Since principles of FAIRNESS are so evident throughout the > > > main body of the Constitution, then, the VICTOR in disputes has to be > > > the side favoring fair play and democracy! The mere fact that the > > > senate was included in the Constitution doesn't make that > > > constitutional! Just because 'laws' are passed doesn't make those > > > constitutional, either. The US Senate has been a drag of fair play > > > and democracy from day one! For the record, the US Supreme Court, > > > wherein one justice has a power greater than Congress, or the People, > > > is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Learn, if you can, MJ. So far you seem > > > committed to a lifetime of taking-over your flunked courses in how to > > > think. — J. A. A. — > > > > > > > On May 25, 9:43 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The US Senate, which was originally selected by the legislatures of > > > > the several states, was an ill conceived OLIGARCHY. Since there has > > > > never been a parity of the population served by each senator, that > > > > means the USA has two conflicting political systems, and the oligarchy > > > > is the one which isn't FAIR. Giving undue power to smaller population > > > > states slaps REPUBLIC ideas in the face. So, the US Senate is and > > > > always has been, unconstitutional.The Senate -- by definition -- cannot > > > > be unconstitutional. > > > > What you (continue) fail to grasp is that the Constitution is/was an > > > > agreement between Sovereign States. The Senate is THEIR representative > > > > body. Amendment 17 curtailed yet another check on Federal power. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ > > > > The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal > > > > government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State > > > > governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised > > > > principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and > > > > foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the > > > > most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will > > > > extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, > > > > concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the > > > > internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -- James > > > > Madison, Federalist Papers > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
