> I'd rather not make it so users who enable IPv6 get *worse* service
> than if they'd stuck to IPv4 only.

Until/unless IPv6 is as widespread and well-carried as IPv4 this is not
really possible.

> If/when there are non-test/lab IPv6-only deployments we can figure
> out a good way to give them better service than currently.

"If"?  There was one a decade ago, and I have no reason to think it was
an isolated incident, nor reason to think they've gotten less common.

I spent the second half of 2002 in Norway, working for Universitetet i
Tromsø.  They found me a place to stay for those six months, and
provided me with network connectivity there.  That connectivity was
IPv6 only.  (I had v6 connectivity back home, but didn't realize until
then just how few of my tools were v6-ready!  Of course, I fixed almost
all of them promptly.)

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                [email protected]
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to