Am 13.05.2012 um 01:07 schrieb Ask Bjørn Hansen: > On May 12, 2012, at 7:13, Peter Hessler wrote: > >> Wouldn't it make sense to make the IPv6 pool simply be a generic World >> pool, with the exception of a few country-specific pools? I agree that >> we want the closest servers as is reasonable, but since we have the >> chicken-and-the-egg problem having a non-optimized solution is good >> enough. > > I'd rather not make it so users who enable IPv6 get *worse* service than if > they'd stuck to IPv4 only. > > If/when there are non-test/lab IPv6-only deployments we can figure out a good > way to give them better service than currently.
Real Soon Now(™) there will be a growing user population for which IPv6 service will likely be (a lot) better than IPv4. My home provider Kabel Deutschland is preparing it's IPv6 rollout, and the beta test is DSlite. I have no idea whether they'll change that for the real rollout, but being able to quickly enable decent service for people on IPv6-only connections (or rather, IPv6 native, IPv4 NAT/CGN) would be nice. Stefan -- Stefan Bethke <[email protected]> Fon +49 151 14070811 _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
