Years ago 1and1 terminated my account for this very reason. Could never get to 
a person that understood the nature of UDP.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:50 PM, "Mouse" <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> [...] we had two rather irate people call our emergency support
>>>> line, demanding that we fix the system that was attacking their
>>>> network.  On port 123/udp.  [...]
>>> [...]
>> Your NTP server could be responding to requests with forged source IP
>> addresses, so in a sense, your server really is "attacking" a
>> third-party.
> 
> I never put the two together now, but this could be why I've never had
> any such complaints.  I have a watcher snooping my port-123 traffic and
> any IP that sends too fast gets router-blocked at my border.  I did
> this out of self-defense against clients that don't understand why it's
> a bad thing to query multiple times a second or the like.  But it does
> mean that I'm not much use as an attack bandwidth amplifier.  (Yes, I
> have similar guards on port 53 too....)
> 
> /~\ The ASCII                  Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X  Against HTML        [email protected]
> / \ Email!         7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> _______________________________________________
> pool mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to