Ok, I will adjust license terms following your example, commit the port
update and let uptream author know about this, since I'm waiting for his
answer about this same license subject for months :)
Related to '${WRKSRC}/../..//docs/License.txt' thats because port uses
'WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}/src/current'
I can't see other way to beutify or simply this variables.
Cheers
Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarc...@protonmail.ch> escreveu no dia sexta,
17/06/2022 à(s) 13:54:
>
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Friday, June 17th, 2022 at 13:47, Nuno Teixeira <edua...@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Hello Lorenzo,
> > First of all thank you all that help me on this subject.
> > Ok, I've take a look at math/maxima and I simplified it to:
> > ---
> > LICENSE= IOZONECLAUSE
> > LICENSE_NAME= Iozone clause
> > LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/../..//docs/License.txt
> > LICENSE_PERMS= dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg-sell auto-accept
> > --
> > portlint and 'make check-license' is happy
> >
> > Is this ok?
>
> For LICENSE and LICENSE_NAME you can use arbitrary strings. In my case I
> used the word 'clause' because it is a clause added to GPLv2 which is the
> main license, but in your case, since I believe the text you posted is the
> full license, I would use the word 'license'; thus I would define
>
> LICENSE= IOZONE
> LICENSE_NAME= Iozone license
>
> Or something similar. But choose the words that make more sense to you: you
> surely know the software better than me.
>
> About LICENSE_PERMS, it looks right to me, but again I am not a lawyer.
>
> LICENSE_FILE seems wrong to me. I assume that your distfile is
> https://www.iozone.org/src/current/iozone3_493.tgz .
> In that case I think you should define
> LICENSE_FILE=${WRKSRC}/docs/License.txt
>
> More generally, a path starting with ${WRKSRC} using .. to get out of
> ${WRKSRC} seems a bad idea to me. Moreover I don't see the need for
> // instead of /.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lorenzo Salvadore
>
