In case anybody mis-read my hasty wording, that was meant to be an agreement that it was off-topic, and assent that yes, the discussion is about open source. It was NOT a suggestion that Ken's article was on topic.Wow, that is totally off-topic.Yes, it was. It's about open source.
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Theo de Raadt
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Martin Schröder
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Eric Furman
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? David Terrell
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Matthias Kilian
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Nikolay Sturm
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Chris Humphries
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Ian Darwin
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Theo de Raadt
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Ian Darwin
- Re: Ken's article. Ian Darwin
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Johan Zandin
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Kurt Miller
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Marc Balmer
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Theo de Raadt
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Tomasz Zielinski
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Nikolay Sturm
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Deanna Phillips
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Adam
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Deanna Phillips
- Re: Java ports: source vs. binary? Nikolay Sturm
