Nam Nguyen:
> It is weird that it successfully builds unit-tests (before ...) then
> tries to rebuild it again (after ...):
The difference is staring you in the face. ;-)
The Makefile mixes "unit-tests" and "./unit-tests". gmake understands
that those refer to one and the same target; our make doesn't.
diff /usr/ports
commit - ba5d71eefddb381a11ffc945887767c4c7e5d5e5
path + /usr/ports
blob - d4ca85af01bda790b0106563a29ab7f6a97a0515
file + net/wget/Makefile
--- net/wget/Makefile
+++ net/wget/Makefile
@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ FAKE_FLAGS = sysconfdir="${PREFIX}/share/examples/wge
FAKE_FLAGS = sysconfdir="${PREFIX}/share/examples/wget"
-# for tests
-USE_GMAKE = Yes
-
CONFIGURE_STYLE = gnu
CONFIGURE_ARGS = --with-ssl=openssl
CONFIGURE_ENV += CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
blob - /dev/null
file + net/wget/patches/patch-tests_Makefile_in (mode 644)
--- /dev/null
+++ net/wget/patches/patch-tests_Makefile_in
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Our make(1) treats ./unit-tests and unit-tests as distinct targets.
+
+Index: tests/Makefile.in
+--- tests/Makefile.in.orig
++++ tests/Makefile.in
+@@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = -I$(top_builddir)/lib -I$(top_srcdir)/li
+
+ AM_CFLAGS = $(WERROR_CFLAGS) $(WARN_CFLAGS)
+ CLEANFILES = *~ *.bak core core.[0-9]*
+-TESTS = ./unit-tests$(EXEEXT) $(PX_TESTS)
++TESTS = unit-tests$(EXEEXT) $(PX_TESTS)
+ TEST_EXTENSIONS = .px
+ PX_LOG_COMPILER = $(PERL)
+ AM_PX_LOG_FLAGS = -I$(srcdir)
+@@ -2429,9 +2429,9 @@ recheck: all $(check_PROGRAMS)
+ am__force_recheck=am--force-recheck \
+ TEST_LOGS="$$log_list"; \
+ exit $$?
+-./unit-tests.log: ./unit-tests$(EXEEXT)
+- @p='./unit-tests$(EXEEXT)'; \
+- b='./unit-tests'; \
++unit-tests.log: unit-tests$(EXEEXT)
++ @p='unit-tests$(EXEEXT)'; \
++ b='unit-tests'; \
+ $(am__check_pre) $(LOG_DRIVER) --test-name "$$f" \
+ --log-file $$b.log --trs-file $$b.trs \
+ $(am__common_driver_flags) $(AM_LOG_DRIVER_FLAGS) $(LOG_DRIVER_FLAGS)
-- $(LOG_COMPILE) \
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
